The UKicon MoD could have adopted a 'new- build' L39 enforcer type sniper instead of the L42 but the trials dictated that it wasn't robust enough. Likewise, during the 80's we could have adopted the more accurate (than the L96) PH sniper rifle. virtually off-the-shelf on the basis of the Can; NZ and Aust. experience but once again, it wasn't robust enough for what a sniper rifle needed to be. It had to be a readily take-off mount for the telescope among other things.

I feel the urge to repeat the process of trials that took place between the contenders but I don't think it will be possible/allowable. But suffice it to say, those mounts didn't get past the first hurdle for a sniper rifle. It's ironic that in the midst of this, the 3 nations have now adopted the L96 or variations of it. And I know for certain the Australiaicon did solely on the basis and say so of our Warminster trials

As I always say..........., You cannot even compare sniping with other forms of shooting. There's a world of difference between the different and various sporting rifles. But sniping is the only sport where the quarry shoots back.

I know it's being a bit pedantic Chris, but are you sure that NONE of these hunters rifles suffered any problems? Surely one or two might have...!