-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
smac61
I'm curious how you came to that conclusion?
Gives me a well defined target ...
Thanks,
Sean
Admittedly, your father could have used any of several different varieties and serial ranges of M1903 rifles. But that one has far and away the highest probability of usage based on the information you provided.
You stated that your father served on a Destroyer in the Pacific. I assume that the Destroyer was newly manufactured and outfitted during the early days of WWII.
The Navy had many thousands of M1903 rifles, most leftover from WWI. But those rifles were already assigned to ships and installations that existed before the war. Any new ships coming on line had to be outfitted with newly-manufactured rifles because existing rifles were already committed elsewhere. And the primary source for newly-manufactured rifles during the early days of WWII was Remington Arms and that was the serial range. I have documentation from the President of Remington Arms quoting Army Ordnance officials that the Navy was clamoring for their rifles and urging expedited production.
I have seen perhaps more than a hundred Remingtons in the aforementioned serial range and they were definitely Navy issue.
Hope this helps. Happy Hunting!
John Beard
p.s.,
And I worked at the CMP
.
Last edited by John Beard; 01-26-2011 at 02:23 AM.
-
-
01-26-2011 02:20 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Deceased May 2nd, 2020
Hi John
Any idea what happened to the M1903's the USMC turned in when they converted to the M1
? Jusrt curious.
VR
C.O
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
John,
Good enough for me, thanks! Seeing as I will never know for sure, that is a very reasonable place to focus our search.
Do you know if Navy issued '03's are marked in any tell tale way?
Thanks again,
Sean
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
smac61
John,
Good enough for me, thanks! Seeing as I will never know for sure, that is a very reasonable place to focus our search.
Do you know if Navy issued '03's are marked in any tell tale way?
Thanks again,
Sean
Some Navy-issue rifles have rack numbers stamped or stencilled into the butt of the stock. Otherwise, the rifles have no special markings.
Hope this helps.
J.B.
---------- Post added at 10:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 PM ----------

Originally Posted by
Cosine26
Hi John
Any idea what happened to the M1903's the USMC turned in when they converted to the
M1
? Jusrt curious.
VR
C.O
Most USMC rifles were sold as surplus through the DCM. Some were sold directly to members of the USMC. Some were sent to Greece and other countries as foreign aid.
Hope this helps.
J.B.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
Deceased May 2nd, 2020
Reverse Safety
The rifle looks as if it has the reverse safety found on some National Match rifles. Also it looks as if the bolt is polished.
-
-
Deceased
Navy vet here USN. I marched with a 1903 Springfield sans FP. in San Diego boot camp.1962. Fired an M1
Garand 16 rounds rifle training. Most other training electronics. gary
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Cosine26
The rifle looks as if it has the reverse safety found on some National Match rifles. Also it looks as if the bolt is polished.
Educate me regarding the reverse safety please.
The bolt does look polished and may have been but it is a WL3 not NS. There is no serial marking of the bolt and the barrel lacks a star gauge. The stock is marked with an S in the cutout but it lacks a serial number and drawing numbers. The barrel and reciever may have been an original set (8-31 SA Barrel) but the balance is mixmaster - a rather well cared for mix master that I am happy to have come into.
Last edited by pmclaine; 01-31-2011 at 07:59 PM.
-
Deceased May 2nd, 2020
Reverse safety
The normal safety is to the left for fire and right for safe. In 1928 the safety was reversed on NM rifles. With the "S" stock, if one "crawled" the stock in prone slow fire, he would probably get hit in the nose by the standard safety. ERGO - the reversed safety which put the safety to the right when in the FIRE position.This safety was available up through about 1931 when the supply was exausted.I believe that the idea came from K.K.V Casey, an early shooter.
If your "C" stock has an "S" in the cutoff recess it may well be a pre war Springfield stock. This is a valuable stock.
It looks as if your bolt is a DHT. Quite a comon cbange by shooters since the NS bolts were "sticky",Or it may just have been installed during overhaul. See Vi's bolt chart.
Last edited by Cosine26; 01-31-2011 at 08:51 PM.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thank you for the reverse safety info.
This may have been someones pet in some armory. It came through CMP
in 2002 so I imagine somebody made its protector get rid of it. It is a prewar Springfield replacement stock. There are no marks other than the S. It has been discussed before on the forum. We just got a new camera I'll have to get some more recent pictures.