1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:00 PM
    Gentlemen, I am not an electrochemistry expert.

    I should therefore be grateful if someone who does have such knowledge could explain just what goes on inside the barrel with these bore cleaners.

    The mixing of vinegar (acid) and ammonia (alkaline?) that is often recommended seems peculiar from the electrolysis aspect. Especially since the usual advice is to keep acids away from steel and not leave ammonia bore cleaning liquids in the bore too long, But this method adds an electrical field to intensify whatever effect these chemical are having.

    Why should the bath just remove the cupro-nickel, and not the steel as well?
    And if it does indeed preferentially remove the CuNi, what about the surfaces that do not have copper fouling?
    And what happens after the copper has all been removed - does the bath then start removing the surface of your barrel?
    Is that black sludge in fact black iron oxide?

    I ask this because in the well-proven electrolysis of rust as a cleaning procedure, the workpiece is the cathode. And the bath is the anode - the sacrificial anode, as it will eventually get eaten away. So when people enthuse about a method whereby the workpiece becomes the anode, I wonder just what is going on....????

    All I find on the internet is sellers' puff and users' enthusiasm, but no satisfactory explanation as to what is happening to the electrolysed surfaces. Someone please enlighten me!



    P.S. If I were you ptf18, I would leave the barrel alone until someone provides a good explanation, other than "I tried it and it worked". How much of their rifling did they remove along with the copper?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 01-30-2011 at 07:30 AM. Reason: P.S.added

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 03A3 bore
    By brande in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-11-2010, 01:30 PM
  2. cleaner, rifle bore(CR)
    By phil evans in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-22-2009, 04:26 PM
  3. Strongest Cleaner to remove cosmoling but not hurt Finish
    By gerry in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 01:22 PM
  4. old cleaner-riflebore GI issue question
    By duggaboy in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-02-2009, 07:44 AM
  5. Sudden Hemorrhage takes can of WW-2 Bore Cleaner
    By Griff Murphey in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2009, 06:54 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts