1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Rolan_Kraps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    05-07-2021 @ 03:38 PM
    Location
    Gainesville, GA USA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    08:29 AM
    Thread Starter

    Thumbs up

    Thank you very much. I appreciate your help.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member vintage hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last On
    @
    Location
    S.C.
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,680
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    08:29 AM
    If you're going to get a micro rear sight be sure it's for the no.4 not the no.5. They look identical at a passing glance. The scale on the no.4 sight will be marked up 1300 yds and the no.5 to 800. I would imagine the graduations are also coarser to compensate for the shorter barrel of the no.5.

  3. #3
    Advisory Panel Parashooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    09-24-2024 @ 01:41 AM
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    80
    Posts
    680
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    08:29 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by vintage hunter View Post
    I would imagine the graduations are also coarser to compensate for the shorter barrel of the no.5.
    That imagination could be mistaken. The shorter sight radius of the No.5 obliges the sight graduations to be finer (closer together) than those on the No.4. As often happens, geometry trumps velocity in this case.

    By actual measurement, the distance from the "2" to the "8" index lines is .235" on a No.5 Mk.1 and .275" on a No.4 Mk.2, both of postwar Fazakerley manufacture.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Parashooter For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Legacy Member Rolan_Kraps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    05-07-2021 @ 03:38 PM
    Location
    Gainesville, GA USA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    08:29 AM
    Thread Starter

    Thumbs up

    I'm going to leave the sight the way it is.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. M1 garand rear sight WW2 sight
    By nchristian in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 11:19 AM
  2. WRA rear sight.
    By Mikey51 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-24-2009, 01:07 PM
  3. Rear Sight ... Can someone help me ID this?
    By alco3 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 08:49 PM
  4. rear sight
    By rice 123 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-14-2009, 12:10 PM
  5. Rear sight base for Target Sight
    By m1903rifle in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 01:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts