Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Enfield - Fully stocked versus free floating barrel?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    06-02-2024
    Local Time
    12:44 AM
    Captain Laidlericon has addressed this issue most succinctly in prior posts. Due to the design and harmonics of the No.4 Mk.1 rifle chambered in Britishicon .303, the most accurate form of bedding was the one that was they had. Experimentation with other forms of bedding did not produce the same level of accuracy. I am sure that they would have cut back on material if they could (and there were experiments with lightened rifles). I do not know much about No.5 Mk.1s (heck, I don't know much about No.4s), but there is a reason why the rearsight was only marked up to 800 yards versus 1300 yards. Regarding the L42A1, this was chambered in 7.62x51 and had a heavier barrel, which changed the harmonics and allowed a shortened forend.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to spinecracker For This Useful Post:


  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE

Similar Threads

  1. 2 versus 5 groove, date of manufacture, sight type for no4 mk1 enfield?
    By lxvnrsw in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-04-2011, 12:32 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-05-2011, 05:07 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-05-2011, 03:45 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-01-2011, 07:20 AM
  5. 2 versus 5 groove barrel
    By w8lftr in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 11:38 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts