-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
1917 US Enfield
I feel I have done quite a bit of research on this rifle as I own one and love it. The thing that is bothering me about it is that it's supposed to weigh about 9lbs empty however mine which is all 1917 parts and totally empty weighs 10.6lbs and I have no idea why. Any ideas as to why its that much of a weight difference in it?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
09-16-2011 03:34 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
Too many coats of varnish, or mabe it's just the weight of the world bearing down on it.
-
Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
It doesn't appear to have all that many coats of varnish on it. I thought they were supposed to weigh 9lbs empty.
-
Advisory Panel
He was kidding about the varnish...
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Wow I feel stuid. Its been one of those months.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I'm sure there are so many differences between them that they aren't "supposed" to all weight the same.
-
Advisory Panel
Lead slug in butt?

Originally Posted by
Guns&such
totally empty weighs 10.6lbs and I have no idea why
This is a serious suggestion:
Remove the buttplate and take a look to see if a slug of lead has been smuggled into the butt to increase the weight and reduce recoil for target shooting.
Patrick
-
-
Contributing Member
The actual weight empty is 9lb 60z, if you add a sling then you are very near 10lb, add to this the many years of oil soaking into the timber, I'd consider myself lucky that it does'nt weigh more.
-
-
Legacy Member
Now, out of curiosity, I'm going to have to go and weigh mine. 
john
-