-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
P1917 Butt Plates too small?
Hope some of ya'll can shed some light on this. As I keep my eyes open for a nice M1917, I've noticed that a number have butt plates that are too small - i.e., the wood overhangs the metal, mostly in the heel. Replacement stock? Wrong butt plate?
Thanks in advance,
John
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
11-10-2011 07:29 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Does this plate make my butt look big?*
Sorry for the bad joke.
Ed reluctantly no longer in the Bitterroot
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Should have known I would get that! (LOL). But seriously, I'm wondering if P14 or some other types of plates are sometimes installed on M17 stocks.
-
Advisory Panel
Wood wider than metal - OK
How much of an overhang are you talking about? My Eddystone stocks are about 1mm proud of the butt plate, all around the rim, and the toes are slightly rounded. My Enfield No 4 stocks are also noticeably proud of the butt plates. Without taking everything out of the cabinets to look, I think this was probably normal procedure in mass-production stock-making, as wood proud of the butt plate does not cause any problems, but a butt plate proud of the wood certainly does (cuts, hang-ups on clothing). And a "sharp" toe is liable to become chipped. So if I was a manufacturer, I would have the machinery set up so that the thinnest butt was always wider then the widest buttplate.
It is the ones where the wood is precisely down to the level of the metal that I would look at more cautiously. In many cases, I think you will find that the wood has been sanded and refinished. In cases where the metal is proud of the wood, this is more obviously so.

Patrick
---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 PM ----------

Originally Posted by
johnu
But seriously, I'm wondering if P14 or some other types of plates are sometimes installed on M17 stocks.
As far as I know, there were no dimensional differences between P14 and M1917 butt plates. "The butt plate assemblies on Pattern 14 and Model of 1917 rifles are identical (except for markings) and interchangeable. ...remained unchanged throughout their service lives." (Stratton, p.75).
Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 11-10-2011 at 02:43 PM.
Reason: typos
-
-
Advisory Panel
the 1928 SMG used a 17 style plate as well, Proud is normal of a stock thats not been sanded heavy.
-
Thank You to Chuckindenver For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
1928 smg?
Thanks for the confirmation Chuck. BTW, what's a 1928 SMG?

Patrick
-
-
Advisory Panel
1928 Sub Machine Gun, tommy gun.
see, now when you find a US made sling thats marked SMG...youll know what it fits,:}
-
Thank You to Chuckindenver For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
The Browning BAR Model 1918 used the same buttplate as the Model 1917 Enfield Rifle
. The Thompson Model 1928A1 buttplate will not fit a Model 1917 stock because the top tang is angled upward by a 1/4 inch. You could bend the top tang down to a 90 degree angle on the Thompson buttplate and it would fit.
-
-
Advisory Panel
notice i said.. 1917 style buttplate???
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thanks, everyone - this information helps a lot.
John