Standard Products carbine - trying to verify components as correct.

[Rustship]

Just my opinion, but the rear sight, the butt Plate, and the bolt markings dont quite look right. Just my opinion, some othere members will answer up. Just curious, did it have a flip sight before you sent it to them? and a type 1 band?

[Harlan (Deceased)]

I currently have the second from the bottom. I assume I need one of the ones on the top?

The second one from the bottom would be fine jismail. I agree with Jim now that I've seen close-ups. Just by having all the parts parked the same including the blued parts, it looks like a carbine would look fresh after a post-war rebuild, and I wouldn't spend a lot to get an original C-tip sling. A mix of parts are indicative of a rebuild too and the D- tip would be as correct as anything. Plus, you already have the D-tip. The Mildew Resistant Treatment stamp on your sling means it's authentic military too.

[2AD_Vet]

Thanks for all the responces, I appreciate your expertise. So getting back to my original question, given the listing of parts with the maker stamps on them in my origninal post, are there any parts with mfgr stamps listed that are not correct to be included in a Standard Products rifle?