And the response can be emailed to here:
deactivatedguns@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
I would suggest that any such measure would have to be backed up by evidence rather than anecdote.
And I would add this snippet of damning evidence (note evidence not anecdote):
"The most recent Home Office firearms figures from 2005/6 show that reactivated or deactivated firearms were recorded as being used in just eight offences, out of a total of 11,084.
Reactivated handguns were used twice; deactivated firearms were used four times; and other reactivated firearms were used twice."
I'm no mathematician but even I can see this is a proportion so minuscule that it is statistically insignificant.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.