+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: M1d dcm garand

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-11-2024 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:36 AM

    Fix?

    I am totally convinced that the fix was in for G&H's M1C. SA did a study of the two designs being considered and the results were plain that the D was better. Ordnance ignored the report, assuming SA was biased -- they were, but it didn't alter the fact that the C was a bit of a clunker. As early as May 1944 an Ordnance guy visited SA and told JCG he might as well quit working on his design, the contract was going to G&H. Making the C was a nightmare and kinda nuts -- they sent receivers to NYC so G&H could drill them because SA couldn't drill five holes? A turnaround time of three months? Each rifle custom fit and interchangeable only by accident? Accuracy not as good as a standard rifle? A 30% failure rate in accuracy testing? History proved SA was right, the C lasted about five years in the hands of troops, then was replaced by the D which lasted over 20 years.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bob Seijas For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    JGaynor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2025 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    888
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    06:36 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Seijasicon View Post
    I am totally convinced that the fix was in for G&H's M1C. SA did a study of the two designs being considered and the results were plain that the D was better. Ordnance ignored the report, assuming SA was biased -- they were, but it didn't alter the fact that the C was a bit of a clunker. As early as May 1944 an Ordnance guy visited SA and told JCG he might as well quit working on his design, the contract was going to G&H. Making the C was a nightmare and kinda nuts -- they sent receivers to NYC so G&H could drill them because SA couldn't drill five holes? A turnaround time of three months? Each rifle custom fit and interchangeable only by accident? Accuracy not as good as a standard rifle? A 30% failure rate in accuracy testing? History proved SA was right, the C lasted about five years in the hands of troops, then was replaced by the D which lasted over 20 years.
    Kind of a similar story with the USMC 1903A1 sniper. The corps was advised in 1940 don't use a target scope (as they did in WW1). They did anyway adopting the 8x Unertl. Within a year the Commandant was telling his people to get A4's from the army. Yeah, the scopes soldiered on all the way to Vietnam but only because the Corps never throws anything away.

    Regards,
    Jim

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts