+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Re-barreling question: Why?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 08:31 AM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    7,479
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    05:20 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by jmoore View Post
    It's not fair to compare the Springfields and Garands to the axis powers' rifles, nor the Sovieticon turnbolts. Mostly because they weren't used after their respective wars to any great degree. SMLEs are generally rebuilt and very often rebarreled much like their US counterparts. No.4 rifles as well, but to a somewhat lesser degree.
    I use the comparison simply to get to an answer which you guys are giving. It's not metal quality or the primers themselves so much, just that they were used much more extensively over their lifespan. That makes perfect sense. I'm not familiar with the Britishicon rebarreling situation. I have three and they all appear to have original barrels but I wouldn't know what to look for to be sure. My 1917 Eddystone has been rebarreled but my 03A3 has not. I don't own a Garandicon but almost every one I've seen has been rebarreled as have most of the Springfields and 1917's I've run across.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    05:20 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    I use the comparison simply to get to an answer which you guys are giving. It's not metal quality or the primers themselves so much, just that they were used much more extensively over their lifespan. That makes perfect sense. I'm not familiar with the Britishicon rebarreling situation. I have three and they all appear to have original barrels but I wouldn't know what to look for to be sure. My 1917 Eddystone has been rebarreled but my 03A3 has not. I don't own a Garand but almost every one I've seen has been rebarreled as have most of the Springfields and 1917's I've run across.
    Extensively would be the clue. The US, the commonwealth, and Italyicon all continued to use the same rifles from WWI until the 1930s. The Italians completely reconfigured many of their rifles to shorter patterns. The US had need of reedily available WWI vintage bolt rifles until there were enough Garands to go around in WWII. Same for the SMLE and No.4. Post WWII the M1icon coninued in use until the 1960s.

    Conversely, Germanicon rifles largely did not continue in service Post WWI except for a very smll number as allowed by the Versailles Treaty. Japaneseicon and German rifles post WWII saw no further use by their home countries to any extent. So no need for massive rebuild programs.

  3. Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Question about a question mark
    By Demo in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-12-2011, 05:11 PM
  2. Re barreling a bcd 4
    By fishn861 in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-23-2011, 06:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts