-
Legacy Member
L1A1 Marking ID help please
-
-
04-30-2012 08:55 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
I would say without a shadow of doubt that they're from Fazakerley. Being late 50's or early 60's production I think that the two piece firing pin was probably modification 1 or 2.
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
Thanks Peter,any idea when Fazakerley went over to using this mark ?
ATB KG
-
-
Legacy Member
Thanks Peter, that's good to have it confirmed as Fazakerley, I have seen other parts with the same stylized etched marking.
-
-
They won't have been using it for long as they quite justifiably had the rug pulled from under them before they got too far with L1A1 production. I seem to recall that the biggest part they got around to producing was trigger mech housings and even then there were thousands rejected that had to be rectified at BSA when they took over from Faz
Incidentally, the Government were so frightened of the consequences of the workers taking over the factory that the Security 'arrangements' at Fazakerley involved an Armed Police there
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Maybe this etching mark was used on parts in which stamping 'F' was impractical?
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I would say without a shadow of doubt that they're from Fazakerley. Being late 50's or early 60's production I think that the two piece firing pin was probably modification 1 or 2.
I think it was Mod Number 4 as this had to be stamped on the inside of the butt plate trap along with mod number 7 This was to save stripping the weapon down just to check the modification had been done.
-
Legacy Member
They won't have been using it for long as they quite justifiably had the rug pulled from under them before they got too far with L1A1 production. I seem to recall that the biggest part they got around to producing was trigger mech housings and even then there were thousands rejected that had to be rectified at BSA when they took over from Faz
Incidentally, the Government were so frightened of the consequences of the workers taking over the factory that the Security 'arrangements' at Fazakerley involved an Armed Police there
How interesting...did any Fazakerley-marked TMHs make it into service? An idea I had once was to create a "Fazakerley" L1A1--find as many examples as I could of genuine "F" marked parts, then assemble them on a US-legal semiauto receiver and an unmarked replacement TMH with custom UF markings. Alas, the L1A1 parts supplier I was planning to use--who had engraving services available and probably could have made the requisite markings--took his own life. End of idea.
-
-
Fazakerley marked TMH's......... yes. Many hundreds went over to Australia with a lot of the L1A1 plant and we saw them on early Lithgow built L1A1's. Someone said that similarly, hundreds went to BSA who corrected them and used them to augment their initial production together with the parts that Fazakerley had finally, after a great deal of teeth pulling, cajoling, bribing and threatening, got around to producing. You'll easily identify Fazakerley TMH's used at Lithgow by the barred out UF57 logo and those used at BSA where the F of the UF has been overpunched to read UB.
Strange that early in #5 of this thread there is mention of the Armed security police there. Then lo and behold, later someone turns up trumps with one of their rifles.
The workers at ROF6 Fazakerley wouldn't use new L1A1 machinery......, insisting on only using the old No4 and L2 Sterling machinery to make the new rifle. To use the new machinery they insisted on being paid more AND having their work status upped to more skilled category.... Anyway........
Last edited by Peter Laidler; 05-17-2012 at 05:35 AM.
-
-
Legacy Member
Wow...the more I hear about ROF Fazakerley, the more it sounds like a study in industrial stupidity on the order of the US Navy's Newport Torpedo Station, creators of the infamous Mark 14 torpedo.
-