-
Advisory Panel
The cutouts obviously did differ on the older/earlier rifles. I just can't remember when the narrow dish took over from the pantograph type of cutout. It was before 8L, maybe 6L? Or earlier? The accuracy of earlier rifles wasn't in question. I had a 2L series that was stolen by a good friend that ran the rifle team. He would come into stores and go through all rifles testing for tight and straight and...well, this rifle would group 5 rounds under a quarter at 100 yds. Yes, that's right. And he had the nerve to take it... Contrary to the belief down south, the FN shot every bit as well as it's contemorary NATO brothers. All series numbers included, not just the late ones. Of course as they got worn, not so accurate...
-
-
05-18-2012 04:08 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Contrary to the belief down south, the FN shot every bit as well as it's contemorary NATO brothers. All series numbers included, not just the late ones.
Oh, I don't doubt that...my C1A1, a Frankenrifle of Canadian
parts assembled on an Imbel receiver, shoots every bit as well as my M14
!
-
Thank You to enbloc8 For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
enbloc8
The "FAL Bible" compilation of R. Blake Stevens' three FAL books includes a reprint of a bill of sale for several C1A1s that were sold to members of a rifle club in 1972.
Took a look at that bill of sale...a new-production 8L from Canadian
Arsenals Ltd. cost $225.00 in 1972. No idea how to convert that through inflation, but that can't have been cheap.
-
-
Contributing Member
Well, my Dad bought a new 4 door Mercury Meteor Rideau in 1972, no power windows and no a/c, but had the .302 V8 engine, and it, new, was $4000 that year..................
Ed
-
-
Advisory Panel
Two years later, I enrolled at the wage of $330 per month. Basic wage in the military. Gas was .25 per gallon in Canada
. That's how much it was.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
boltaction
I don't know anything much about variations of the C1 as there is little info out about them, but this one was originally built in 1960, with no modifications certainly since the late 1960's. So, I think the receiver is as it was built, FWIW. Does anyone want me to take photos of the internals or the receiver when cracked open?
Ed
Ed,
Can you take a picture of the top of the action with the bolt and top cover removed?
And the right side and bottom of the receiver ring and barrel?
Is the serial number matching the lower?
Thx D
-
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
As far as I know Peter, we were hogs with our rifles. Only Canada
. There are others here I expect to join this discussion but I'm certain we didn't sell any. Not like the C7. That's why when you talked about working on CDN rifles in workshop in Europe it surprised me.
-
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
The 7.62 you saw in Germany
may have been DA in the earlier days and IVI later on. The DA would have been preemo stuff...
-