1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 27
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    06-12-2025 @ 05:00 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,121
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    01:51 AM
    I think a lot of Savage spare parts were shipped along with complete rifles in '42-'43. I've seen several ROF Maltby rifles with Savage parts installed during new production. I've tried to talk some guys out of changing them because they think they're incorrect on a Britishicon production rifle. The same holds true for Long branch rifles produced after the end of Savage production in 1944. They shipped all of the remaining spares to Long Branch where they were used in new rifle production. Would it simply be a case of using spares as requisitioned? If they got a box of Savage Mk.1 rear sights, then modify and use them. I wouldn't change them. They're probably right as rain.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member Entry Level's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last On
    01-24-2024 @ 11:47 AM
    Location
    Carpinteria, Ca
    Posts
    101
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    09:51 PM
    Thread Starter

    Monthly Military Benchrest

    Since the scope is off for overhaul I shot the Enfield without. The S rear sight worked well, looks within requirements for group size. I tinkered with front sight also to bring strike to the right with some success. I include a pic of target. Disregard the Gibbs target it's just part of picture. One of the shooters was using a diopter on his glasses and said it helped with the focus on front sight and target. Has anyone used this device or have a comment? thanks for all the info.

    Attachment 34435

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No.5 Mk1, "D" mark on knox form, is this "DRILL ONLY"?
    By Gordp56 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-05-2012, 01:43 PM
  2. The origin of the Long Branch "Maltese cross" mark?
    By Surpmil in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 06:49 AM
  3. "Crown Over 30" Mark on Toe of S&W .455 "2nd Model"
    By jmoore in forum Other Military Service Pistols and Revolvers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-14-2011, 09:33 AM
  4. "Making Their Mark" - Canadian Snipers and the Great War 1914-1918
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-28-2006, 05:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts