+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Photograph of rare Canadian Telescopic Rifles from WWII (Expert opinions wanted)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    76
    Posts
    12,986
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    12:49 PM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by CheesyCigar View Post
    The 5th man from the left appears to be holding a plain-jane No.4 telescopic rifle. (unless someone can spot something out of the ordinary)

    The man 6th from the left is holding a cut down rifle. I am almost certain that it is (or is closely related to) this rifle: 1943-44 Enfield No.4 Mk1* Experimental Long Branch 'Scout' Sniper Rifle

    Like the rifle listed in the Knowledge Libraryicon, it has a cut-down stock, a totally new buttstock (rollover cheekpiece and a rubber butt), and no charger bridge. From this angle, it's difficult to tell whether or not it's fitted with the windmill-style 4 position backsight (which was mounted on the left side of the receiver) As well, this rifle mounts a different scope: the C No.32 Mk 4 (C No.67 Mk I) onto what should be a Griffin & Howe mount. (which was what the type was configured with. I, however, might be incorrect. But from I can see, it appears to be a match)
    Great quality pic…..

    Thanks for posting it for everyone to share …

    I believe your conclusions about that specific rifle are correct. I have enlarged an area of the pic where you can see through to the other side and you can just make out the windmill off-set rear sight, plus when you look at the from sight area, you can clearly see how it swivels outwards to the left, in order to line up with the windmill sight.

    Attachment 34490 (Click PIC to Enlarge) Attachment 34491

    Other than the butt, which in our MKLicon example is a standard looking No.4 butt with the cheekpiece, it does appear that the one you've referred to in your grandfather's pic is also one of the 10 experimental rifles produced at Long Branch.

    Although you can't tell from the angle of the barrel whether the rifle in the pic has a bayonet lug, if it did, then like the one in the library entry, it would be just 1 of 4 (possibly 3 if US bayonet lug) produced like this. Extract… "Four of these were to accept the No.4 spike bayonet, three were described as "semi-long forend and US bayonet" while the last three were not setup to accept any bayonet."

    (Click PIC to Enlarge)

    Regards,
    Doug
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Badger For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Opinions wanted on this IBM
    By LeagleEagle in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2011, 03:37 PM
  2. NO32 Mk1 scope (opinions wanted)
    By MichielVR in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-28-2010, 07:33 AM
  3. 1905 SA bayonet dated 1921, opinions wanted
    By bigduke6 in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-03-2010, 03:05 AM
  4. some Opinions wanted..& I'm a bit of a show off
    By OWCH in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 06:34 AM
  5. Opinions Wanted: Refinishing Metal on a Steyr M95
    By SeamusMac in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 07:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts