-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
08-13-2012 12:30 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Very nice.
I have two of them and they are surprisingly accurate.
-
-
-
Contributing Member
I have a 1954 and didn't really think about it with that date but a 1958? Is the date the year the mauser 1943 was made or the year it was converted to the FR-8? 1958 seems awful late to still be producing an 8mm K98 style rifle.
My sources say the conversions were done in the 1950's as well which seems to support that being the date of conversion.
I can't see any indications the receiver was scrubbed and restamped but an arsenal rework would be hard to detect.
-
-
Legacy Member
Pretty sure that was the date of the original '43 Mauser production
-
-
Contributing Member
A guy on Surplus Rifles is doing a survey of serial numbers and says that the year stamped on the receiver is the 43 Mauser date not the conversion date and that the serial numbers are not year specific. So they were making Mausers in 1958. That may be the last year as I don't think they had any rifles newer than that.
FR-7's had the old markings stripped.
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
Aragorn243
So they were making Mausers in 1958. That may be the last year as I don't think they had any rifles newer than that.
Could be right about that. I've got two...a 1955 that is in pretty good shape and a 1948 that some ijit urethaned.
(Shown straddling an Enfield 2A)
Attachment 36041
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Guys,
Thanks for the responses!
I debated about how to post my 2nd FR8. I decided to include it on this thread, vs. making its own....
Here I have a 195? FR8 in "different" condition as the one that I posted... and yes, the "?" is by intent...
No matter what I try, the last digit can't be read. I suppose I could remove some of the parking to see what highlights, but this would ruin the rifle. As you will notice, the crest, La Coruna and date are VERY shallow.
The rifle was purchased via Dunhams Sports, on the last round of importing. Shocking enough... this one does have matching numbers:
As is typical of these rifles, they are sharp looking!
This one has some sort of lacquer or paint on the muzzle end, that I have yet to strip off... it comes out as a muddy brown with the flash.
This one doesn't have a bayonet, but I suppose I could march out and get a CETME bayo for it...
The handguard doesn't match the rest of the rifle when it comes to finish:
The usual cartridge markings: