-
Contributing Member
CRB marked Rosses
Further to this, I just picked up a WWI M10 with the CRB stamp on the receiver. I have owned a couple before which were somewhat sporterized, so I assumed they might be WWII issue as well, or whatever. However, this one wears full wood, 1916 dated, with a nice CEF stamp on the buttstock. The receiver is stamped with a host of British proofs and the CRB 2425. The bolt has a mismatch number, which was obviously applied in Britain or somewhere else as we all know Ross bolts weren't numbered. I considered whether this might be a "mated" rifle, wiht a stock put on a different action, but if so it was a LONG time ago--this rifle action and stock have been together for a very long time. Given the Canadian habit of the time to mark on the wood and the British to mark on the metal, I would agree that these might have been British issue in some way. However, this one clearly started out as a CEF issued Ross, so was not a commercial purchase or one made up after the gov't seized the Ross factory. Still a mystery, though. The rifle has a nice bore, and a nice "used and been there" feel to it. I just love old Rosses.
Ed
Attachment 29638Attachment 29639Attachment 29640Attachment 29641
-
-
01-07-2012 08:05 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
.
It is interesting that the PLY stamped Ross rifles has evolved into a three year project that should bear fruit this year. It started with a thread here on Milsurps about the meaning of the PLY markings. SMELLIE and I were sucking down coffee at his house, (a once a week event) when he mentioned that he had a PLY Ross. It was over that coffee that the significance of the markings ON THE METAL hit us, and the subsequent results seems to have corresponded to our original suppositions. Canadian rifles of the time period were stamped on the butt stock wood.
Since there were PLY rifles with numbers up into the 6000 range, the question was "What British Unit, after 1916, would be large enough to need 6000 rifles?" This quickly narrowed the possibilities down to a handfull, one of which was the Royal Marines.
Letters, phone calls and e-mails to the Royal Marines were made, and the Royal Marines Museum tends to agree with us. They also supplied a lot of other information, such as the Weedon List of 1930, photographs and photocopies of various documents. Much of the information in these documents have been confirmed by a well known and respected Australian researcher who is interested in the Naval aspect of WWI.
At the start of WWI, the Royal Marines had to give their Short Magazine Lee Enfield Rifles to the Army, which was short of rifles. In return they were armed for a time with Japanese Arasaka rifles, but were eventually standardized with the Ross Mark III that the Canadians had exchanged for SMLE rifles. This is why the CEF markings appear on the PLY and other rifles. There were many pictures of Royal Marines armed with Ross Rifles, including some taken in 1919 when the German Fleet scuttled at Scapa Flow.
It is not only Ross rifles that ended up in Naval Service. The Mauser rifles from HMS Canada, Winchester 44-40 rifles, Remington 44-40 pump gun rifles, and Remington Rolling Block rifles were also purchased in the USA and sent to England, where they did good service on some of the smaller vessels and Costal and Harbour craft. One of the Agents who bought and shipped some of these rifles was J.P. Morgan.
With the information available now, it is believed that the CRB rifles were used by the Royal Marines Depot in Crombie, England, the PLY rifles were used by the Royal Marines Depot in Plymouth, England and the PHAB rifles were used by the Priddies Hard Arsenal, (a munitioning dock and depot for warships,) in England. These are the three most commonly found markings on the British Naval rifles.
.
Last edited by buffdog; 01-09-2012 at 10:42 AM.
-
-
Contributing Member
Funny, I just posted pictures over on Rossrifle.com of some PLY marked stuff, including pictures of Marines with issue Rosses. I didn't realize the two markings were connected. Thanks very much! Another little historical mystery solved...........
Ed
-
-
Advisory Panel
Things continue working out the way they seem to be, we should have some STUNNING photos and a writeup or all you Ross fans, come April.
Keep watching.
.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to smellie For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by
smellie
Things continue working out the way they seem to be, we should have some STUNNING photos and a writeup or all you Ross fans, come April.
Keep watching.
.
Any further news on the writeup on Marine issued Rosses? Awaiting with interest!
Ed
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
Advisory Panel
There is another actual alternative, though I don't believe it is applicable in this case due to the sheer volume.
My copy of "Instructions for Canadian Ordnance Services 1924" with all updates thru April '41 shows "C" Company (C.) "Le Regiment de Beuce" (R.B.) of Military District No.5
So according to Paragraph 371-373 and Appendex IV the proper way of marking arms on charge of Company "C" would be:
C.R.B.
372 "The marking of barrels....is strictly forbidden."...
373 ..."Care should be taken that the marks on the small arms are not too deeply stamped."
In my experience with a few Pre WWI and Pre & Post WWII Canadian small arms, Government Property marks (C^) are often found stamped on the receiver and knox form, unit markings are another story.
Unit and formation markings are found on the butt stock of Ross rifles, not the receiver.
I don't believe these particular Ross rifles are Canadian marked.
Last edited by Lee Enfield; 10-05-2012 at 04:53 PM.
-
-
Advisory Panel
So far, I have not encountered a PLY rifle....... nor a CRB rifle...... lacking British Post-WW2 commercial proof marks. It is entirely possible that some are out there, but I have not been bitten by one.
Yet.
There is always tomorrow.
For the Ross Rifle in Canadian Service, standard practice was to mark the rifle's history on the WOOD, as in normal Australian practice.
British practice was to mark the METAL..... and the PLY rifles are uniformly-marked on the thinnest part of the Receiver Ring. This is NOT where someone who was familiar with the construction of the rifle would have marked it. The numbers for the PLY Rosses run to over 6000. I think that if any Canadian Armourer had marked 6000 Rosses (which already were hard enough to rebarrel) on the thinnest part of the Receiver Ring, he still would be doing push-ups at Valcartier!
Th PHAB marking is in accordance with Canadian Overseas Battalion markings: on the wood, a small circular stamping, under the Wrist of the Stock. It consists of the letters PHAB in a circle with the number 1 or 2. It is definitely NOT a Canadian formation marking. I have a pair of PHAB rifles, one a "1", the other a "2"; both are "stripped" rifles, although slightly different.
CRB rifles, again, are marked on the METAL: normal British practice, definitely NOT normal Canadian practice at that time.
Hope this helps.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I just obtained, traded, a M-10 Ross marked CRB cut down to 21" barrel and mis matched bolt. Good operating condition and I will try out with some hand loaded cast bullets. (light load)
I understand these were conversions done in England ( E mark for chamber enlargement), but only marks I could find indicating British ownership were the BM under bomb.
Only wood mark I can read is a 58 at top rear of right side BUT stock cut down to have recoil pad applied so could have been sanded heavily as well.
Detailed photos can be viewed here: Picasa Web Albums - Phil Cressman - Ross M 1910
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
What you describe as the "BM under bomb" is a Birmingham commercial proof mark under a Crown. Also, the "Nitro Proof" stamp is an indication of British Proof of rifles sold for export.
The Markings shown are about "standard" for these surplussed Ross sporters.
.