-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
HOOKED ON HISTORY
I am reasonably aware of the current prices so if I can I aquire them at a fair price I do so. Any ideas about the 21 painted on the but? Opps ,just realized no picture of the 21 it is hand painted on the swiveling No 4 attachment portion in white paint.
It is common pratice in the British
Forces. For the Armoury Storeman to paint 'Butt Numbers' on smallarms held in thier Armouries. Less common, but I suggest that the same practice was used on Bayonets by SOME Arms Storemen. The Reason is very simple really. When issuing out weapons rapidly, it would be VERY time consuming to write down the serial Numbers of every single weapon on the issue sheets.
He will have a a pre printed out/Hand Written pad of sheets with every single weapon held on his charge in the armoury. Along side all this info will be a 'Butt Number' allocated to each serially numbered weapon.
To that end it is VERY simple for him to check down the list to a butt number & get the guy who it is issued to to sign the sheet in the last box on the list with his signiture. This then ensured that there was 'Evidence' of the weapon taken off the charge of the Arms Storeman. & responsibility for safe keeping passed over the the issue-ee.
As a bonus, if there were any damage caused & not reported as it may have been through negligent or carless handling. The Armourer could check the issue sheet & track who was the last person to have had the weapon in thier Charge. a very easy way to point the finger at susspicion evidencialy at the Poor sap who had the misfortune to hand a weapon back in without reporting the defect/damage caused!
Consequently, he would be pulled, questioned & more than liikely charged with the 'Offence'. To recoup some of the cost to the taxpayer!
The EASY way to avoid this 'Difficulty'. Was to report the Armourer. Be HONEST about what had transpired. And most decent Armourers would 'sort' the problem & would be in the most agreeable position of having a case of Beer provided free of charge! I am absolutely SURE Peter, Skippy, & other Brother Armourers like myself. Have been in this 'Fortunate' situation, MANY times indeed!..........
-
Thank You to tankhunter For This Useful Post:
-
11-03-2012 04:56 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
tankhunter
To recoup some of the cost to the taxpayer!
You mean like recouping some of the cost to the taxpayer by cutting up and selling for scrap ,sound arms that could find their way into the hands of citizens? Some governmental procedures make more sence than others. Thanks for the detailed explination I knew there must be one.
-
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
tankhunter
It is common pratice in the
British
Forces. For the Armoury Storeman to paint 'Butt Numbers' on smallarms held in thier Armouries. Less common, but I suggest that the same practice was used on Bayonets by SOME Arms Storemen. The Reason is very simple really. When issuing out weapons rapidly, it would be VERY time consuming to write down the serial Numbers of every single weapon on the issue sheets.
He will have a a pre printed out/Hand Written pad of sheets with every single weapon held on his charge in the armoury. Along side all this info will be a 'Butt Number' allocated to each serially numbered weapon.
To that end it is VERY simple for him to check down the list to a butt number & get the guy who it is issued to to sign the sheet in the last box on the list with his signiture. This then ensured that there was 'Evidence' of the weapon taken off the charge of the Arms Storeman. & responsibility for safe keeping passed over the the issue-ee.
As a bonus, if there were any damage caused & not reported as it may have been through negligent or carless handling. The Armourer could check the issue sheet & track who was the last person to have had the weapon in thier Charge. a very easy way to point the finger at susspicion evidencialy at the Poor sap who had the misfortune to hand a weapon back in without reporting the defect/damage caused!
Consequently, he would be pulled, questioned & more than liikely charged with the 'Offence'. To recoup some of the cost to the taxpayer!
The EASY way to avoid this 'Difficulty'. Was to report the Armourer. Be HONEST about what had transpired. And most decent Armourers would 'sort' the problem & would be in the most agreeable position of having a case of Beer provided free of charge! I am absolutely SURE Peter, Skippy, & other Brother Armourers like myself. Have been in this 'Fortunate' situation, MANY times indeed!..........

A crate of beer can get you out of a whole heap of s**t, MT Ops, PTIs, Boss', not so much the wife though.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
HOOKED ON HISTORY
You mean like recouping some of the cost to the taxpayer by cutting up and selling for scrap ,sound arms that could find their way into the hands of citizens? Some governmental procedures make more sence than others. Thanks for the detailed explination I knew there must be one.

Hi Hooked, I share your sorrow for what appears to us as collectors. To be a sensless waste of equipment, But you MUST bear in mind. Tha Government Departments do NOT function on Common sense!
Rules & regulations are what count in the Military. There ARE regs set out in E.M.E.R.s for Armourers & other Trades as to inspection standards & resulting actions from them.
As an relevant example on bayonets. On Bowie Bladed bayonets like the SLR L1A3/A4 Or the No.7, Or No.9. 'The Blade length must NOT be reduced by less then 7.5" Inches'. Is ONE of many inspection standards applied to bladed Bayonets
That is to say: That as a result os sharpening over the years, Damage to tips & repointing Etc. If the blade length was then reduced to LESS than 7.5" Inches. It was to be condemend, & reduced to scrap.
All of the condemend bayonets should have been stripped down for servicable componants & put in the spares boxes by the unit Armourer.
Then, the blades were Gas axed (Oxy-Acettelyne) torch cut in half. Or put in a bench vice & snapped in half. Then the two halves were slung in the small arms scrap box for sercure disposal.
I have wondered if a blade length of 7.25" would be any less damaging with causing an incapacitaing wound. Or would kill you any less dead-er then one of 7.5" inches?.....However! Rules is Rules, & you HAVE to have a starting point to work from, agreed?
I know that quite few were 'saved' by Armourers like myself, Peter & Skippy to name a just a few of us. That were cleaning up & fitted to a purpose made wall plaque, with regimental capbadge. & a brass nameplate for presentation to a senior member of the unit in the Mess. That would be part of thier leaving presentation Gift from Senior ranks. So at least 'SOME' were saved & went on to a 'life extention program', of sorts!..........
-
Thank You to tankhunter For This Useful Post:
-
I notice a new paxolin No7 bayonet grip on that auction site.
-