-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Bruce McAskill
The type 3 hammer could be correct. It's within about 20,000 of the start of the type 3 hammer listed by Riesch. Real nice carbine anyway you look at it.
That's the way I see it. It makes perfect sense unless it was a field change-out which may be possible? Every part on this rifle looks like they have been together since birth. Regards, Rick.
-
-
01-30-2013 06:31 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
I have SG 3,465,948
Straight SG hammer,
Only thing out of place is a Type III rear sight.
Looks very nice Rick, Congrats !!
CH-P777
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Congrats Rick!! Nice carbine, enjoy.
Regards.....Frank
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Looks like a great find Congrats!
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
painter777
I have SG 3,465,948
Straight SG hammer,
Only thing out of place is a Type III rear sight.
Looks very nice Rick, Congrats !!
CH-P777
I can assure you that rear sight has never been removed from that rifle since it left the factory. Regards, Rick.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
sakorick
I can assure you that rear sight has never been removed from that rifle since it left the factory. Regards, Rick.
I think that sight gives it some class. Could have even been done by the GI that carried it ? Never know?
-
Legacy Member
The rear sights being cut to a V are not unusual on carbines. A lot of GI's were hunters who had shot a V rear sight most of their lives and were used to is. The felt that they could shoot better with the V notch then a peep as it gave them more vision then the peep did.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Probably faster sighting then with a peep too
-

Originally Posted by
sakorick
Originally Posted by painter777
I have SG 3,465,948
Straight SG hammer,
Only thing out of place is a Type III rear sight.
Looks very nice Rick, Congrats !!
CH-P777
I can assure you that rear sight has never been removed from that rifle since it left the factory. Regards, Rick.
Rick,
I was talking about the Type III rear sight on mine.
Charlie-Painter777
-
Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
I still think it could be a little early for the straight hammer on this gun. Saying that doesn't mean it's not possible though. If you think, Saginaw started putting it's carbines together in May of 43. The straight hammer was more in late much later in 43. It's still a very nice carbine though no matter what. I wouldn't at all mind having it.
-