-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Need help with these Enfield Markings
Hi all. First time posting but I've been lurking around the forum for a while. I've been researching a friends No.4 MK1 rifle and I'm having a hard time recognizing a royal cypher mark and some adjacent marks close to it. I believe the rifle is a BSA Shirley due to the fact that it has a N3XXXX serial number and M47C matching marks on the barrel and stock. I'll try to attach an image of the cluster of markings that I have questions about. If someone more knowledgeable could identify them for me I'd appreciate it. The rifle will never be sold as it was passed down from my friends grandfather however I would like to get an idea of what it would be worth in today's milsurp market.
Many Thanks for your assistance.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
02-23-2013 02:06 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Can't help with the markings. Value wise your friends rifle has no collector value since it's been sporterized and is only worth what it's parts would bring if broken down sold at auction. It would probably be worth more to someone looking for a cut down Enfield to hunt with than it's parts would fetch especially if the reciever has been d/t for a scope. It would be possible to restore it but that would most likely cost more than the rifle would be worth in the end, IMO.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Vintage Hunter is spot on. Pretty much worthless on the collector market. $150 at a gun show all day long. However, I don't see how any of that matters. The sentimental value outweighs market value in my opinion. At the end of the day it's a cool rifle because it was passed down. Treasure it for what it is. Thanks for sharing.
-
Thank You to nhetzer For This Useful Post:
-
From back to front your barrel markings are: Broadarrow signifying British
military ownership. '44- the date of the barrel mfg. And the pile of small markings in front are factory inspectors' marks signifying that the component passed some stage of fabrication.
The major drawback to returning this rifle to it's former military congiuration is that the barrel appears to have been shortened forward of the front sight. If you have determination and machining skills, a stub could be added, but either repalcing the barrel or repairing it visually by farming out the work would put you behind the price/value curve.
However, it does look to be in otherwise good condition (what hasn't been modified, that is.) The #3 bolt head is a popular item and metal and butt look good.
Shoot it, add a military front end if you want, and consider it ground zero for your Lee Enfield interests!
Last edited by jmoore; 02-23-2013 at 07:33 PM.
-
-
Legacy Member
Biggest issue I see is that it looks like the receiver bridge has been removed.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thanks everyone for the comments. I had no clue that the rifle was sporterized. Is this something that would have been in England
or State side? My friends grandfather was British but was transferred over to the U.S to assist in training pilots during the beginning of the war. Special thanks to jmoore for the assistance with the markings.
-
Legacy Member
It would have been done after it left military service.
-
Thank You to gsimmons For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Looks like a #3 bolt head. Could be worth what something based on another post.
-