1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 38
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Moderator
    (Milsurp Forums)
    Bill Hollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-29-2025 @ 11:57 PM
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Oregon
    Posts
    6,143
    Real Name
    Bill Hollinger
    Local Date
    07-01-2025
    Local Time
    06:01 AM
    Looks like quite a load there! What is the rate of fire on one of these?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Bill Hollinger

    "We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"

  2. #2
    Legacy Member MG1918's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 12:07 AM
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    343
    Local Date
    07-01-2025
    Local Time
    08:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Hollinger View Post
    Looks like quite a load there! What is the rate of fire on one of these?
    The rate of fire is limited like most weapons by the 'feeding' so for these they used 250 rounds per belt. The rate was therefore considered as 500 rds per minute. There are no reports or evidence that the Germans stitched 250 rd belts together in order to make a one single longer belt. Of course as these are water cooled and barrel wear then for extended periods they could cope with prolonged firing.
    Mark

    ---------- Post added at 11:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by AZPhil View Post
    Thank You MG1918 for sharing those awesome pic's!

    So on the carry position pic I have to ask,
    How much weight is that guy hauling?
    Thanks
    Semper Fi
    Phil
    The inter-war adapted gun and sled had additional add-ons so was heavier than the WWI versions. Anyway the individual if carrying the sled and gun, no drum either is looking at 'manually transporting' around 64 kg! This weight was supported as in that image by 2 small shoulder pads and a wooden block for the back. Even under normal conditions this is not comfortable.....
    Mark

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. The MG08/15
    By MG1918 in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 161
    Last Post: 04-19-2025, 03:21 PM
  2. The MG08
    By MG1918 in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 02-15-2025, 09:25 AM
  3. No 4 Mk1 T Transit box Reproductions/Canadian Version
    By grant580 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 122
    Last Post: 07-09-2023, 11:07 AM
  4. NM Collector Software Version 2.5.4 now available
    By nmCollector in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-28-2012, 10:39 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-04-2009, 06:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts