-
For comparison (dang, it's the next page!):

A bit less discoloration surrounding the pad, but definitely evident.
Very useful photos in Post #30. The front pad area seems nicely unmolested. Not a "happy" rifle, but it's good for showing technical details.
Last edited by jmoore; 05-03-2013 at 03:31 PM.
-
-
05-03-2013 03:24 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
-
Thank You to paul87buick For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Yet more pictures
putting in pics is a pain
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to paul87buick For This Useful Post:
-
11450 is an ex Indian Army telescope from the Peter Bloom stable
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Photos ARE a pill. But ever so worth the trouble if they give good detail. As annoying as Photobucket has been, their "cropping" feature in the edit mode is my most used tool. But I have yet to figure out how to insert photos directly to this site with out using the IMG link from that site... So no handy thumbnails like you have managed. 
ETA:
11450 is an ex Indian Army telescope...
Which most likely means it was used a good bit during WWII by the British
...Easier to send on the "experienced" gear and keep the unissued goods at home. (It's a theory!)
Last edited by jmoore; 05-03-2013 at 05:05 PM.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jmoore
But I have yet to figure out how to insert photos directly to this site with out using the IMG link from that
You have to use the 'attachments' tool under the 'go advanced' reply - but the pics have to be fairly small so it does get a bit fiddly. I'm not sure photobucket offers all that many options to free users - I find ipiccy quite good for the resizing.
-
Thank You to PrinzEugen For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Lots of detail in your pictures.
It's very difficult to assess the engraving or stamping of the serial number on the butt socket without larger pictures or first hand observations. The receiver has been modified ...firstly for a Weaver scope rail and secondly a sear stop....both these can be repaired by a skilled toolmaker so they are undetectable to the human eye.
Is your barrel 5 groove? It have the correct year '44, LB and inspection marks. your good there!
Remove the butt and see if the rifle serial number is on the top of the butt socket. It will tell you if the butt is original. cheekpiece hole spacing a bit off however looks like the cheekpiece was mounted for a left hand shooter. Hole spacing on my LB T cheekpiece (walnut) is 3" centre to . My Brit (beech) measures 3 1/8"and an unmounted one 2 3/4"..interesting?
Your trigger guard has a trigger stop added...do not reason.....anybody?
I'd try a repro front pad to see if holes line up....I'm not about to take mine off however I don't see an evidence of solder running beyond the pad like yours..especially on the rear. All screws are staked ...yours are not.
Get as many opinions as possible on originality. Parts are out there...will be pricey however and assembled LB T is very desirable and valuable.
Ron(Canada
)
-
Thank You to rgg_7 For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Had another look at the left side view picture. Noticed that there is a long thin "T" in front of the "No4 MK1*" marking. Anybody run into this before? Ron (Canada
)
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
rgg_7
Lots of detail in your pictures.
It's very difficult to assess the engraving or stamping of the serial number on the butt socket without larger pictures or first hand observations. The receiver has been modified ...firstly for a Weaver scope rail and secondly a sear stop....both these can be repaired by a skilled toolmaker so they are undetectable to the human eye.
Is your barrel 5 groove? It have the correct year '44, LB and inspection marks. your good there!
Remove the butt and see if the rifle serial number is on the top of the butt socket. It will tell you if the butt is original. cheekpiece hole spacing a bit off however looks like the cheekpiece was mounted for a left hand shooter. Hole spacing on my LB T cheekpiece (walnut) is 3" centre to . My Brit (beech) measures 3 1/8"and an unmounted one 2 3/4"..interesting?
Your trigger guard has a trigger stop added...do not reason.....anybody?
I'd try a repro front pad to see if holes line up....I'm not about to take mine off however I don't see an evidence of solder running beyond the pad like yours..especially on the rear. All screws are staked ...yours are not.
Get as many opinions as possible on originality. Parts are out there...will be pricey however and assembled LB T is very desirable and valuable.
Ron(
Canada
)
Ron, Long Branch No4T snipers do not have the same markings as H&H snipers and like H&H the markings they did have evolved during production.
Most of the things you have zerod in on are known features of Long Branch produced snipers.
D
-
Thank You to Lee Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
cheeck rests
The blond cheek rest on the left I purchased about three years ago from DS Solutions it fits my long branch,holes line perfect it fits tight on stock. The right check rest is a H&H original holes in the wrong place for my long branch T and is loose on the stock.I think the different cheek rest holes is a long branch variation . pics no 2 3 10 are other N04 mk1 T s with the same cheek rest hole locations . Attachment 42970Attachment 42977Attachment 42976Attachment 42975Attachment 42974Attachment 42973Attachment 42972Attachment 42969Attachment 42971Attachment 42978 I had these pics in a different order but they shuffled them self pic down loading is still a frigging pain. Picture #3 looks like the type I need .
Last edited by paul87buick; 05-05-2013 at 12:52 AM.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to paul87buick For This Useful Post: