1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 6 of 6
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:12 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,543
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    06:23 PM
    Hi Dohunter. BSA was allocated the code M47 (Midlands manufacturer number 47) & as there were several BSA facilities they were all subdivided further into 'M47A' (BSA Small Heath), 'M47B' (Redditch), 'M47C' (Shirley). I think there may have been a 'D' as well, but I'm speaking from memory now without the books in front of me - no doubt you get the point anyway. The Shirley plant marked early No4 rifles with the letter 'B' usually followed by or immediately above the date eg. B 1941. They started using M47 at some point in 1943 & later in the same year went the whole hog & started marking rifles M47C. Thus 1943 manufacture rifles can be found marked B, M47 or M47C, depending when during that year they were produced.

    The lack of an 'S' on the cut-off block may simply be indicative of the fact that a replacement rear sight was required to be fitted during the sniper conversion process. I have owned a couple of 1943 BSA T's that lacked the S like yours, & they were fitted with Savage made rear sights which had certainly been on them for a long time, & which I suspect were fitted when the rifles went through Holland & Hollands - perhaps because the rifles arrived fitted with just battle sights, which were not acceptable on snipers' rifles.

    Hope this helps to flesh things out a little for you. I'd still buy those books from Brian anyway though!!

    ATB
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 05-27-2013 at 04:02 PM. Reason: typo

  2. The Following 10 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. 1943 Lee Enfield No4Mk(T) is it real or fake?
    By monster_mccauley in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-15-2011, 03:25 PM
  2. 1903 USMC Sniper Question
    By pete-z in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-13-2011, 09:16 PM
  3. Nice No1Mk111 from No4Mk(T)
    By 303carbine in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 01:37 PM
  4. Mauser Sniper Rifle Question
    By Valkyrie45 in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 12:46 AM
  5. Polish sniper question
    By sdh1911 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-15-2007, 07:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts