-
Legacy Member
Looking at an 1896 Krag, opinions welcome
-
-
06-16-2013 12:41 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I would put the money towards a Krag
that would be more correct and less Bubba
-
-
Legacy Member
Without pics hard to tell.
Pros: 1896 models more desirable. You can check SN on National Archives.
Cons: Bubba'd probably beyond recovery.
Spend your money elsewhere. I found a nice one (1898) I could trace the history back to turn of century. Fore end stock had been cut back. Pieced in a forearm and now have a very nice piece with $475 invested.
Best of luck in your search.....
-
Thank You to gtodan For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
There's a good chance it saw service in the Spanish American War. Model 92 & 96 rifles, and Model 96 carbines were the Krags most used in that conflict. It is an antique, however I doubt that you'll be able to talk the FFL into letting you have it without the usual BATF check. If it were me, you could have it without a check and "Sold as antique" would be noted in my book, putting an end to its trail. There are a couple different brands of low scope safeties that were made for the Krag
. Buehler is one. They come up on ebay or gunbroker from time to time. Krag ammo is somewhat hard to come by, and expensive. Reloading components, especially brass, isn't made as often as it once was, and I've heard rumors the brass manufacturers were going to stop making it. I can't say how reasonable the price is, except I've noticed that most sporterized Krags on gunbroker, unless they're totally trashed, start around $400. They make excellent cast bullet shooters, and in the majority of them one can use the same bullets that you would for .303 British
as the bores are predominately .301, and groove diameter is often .310 or larger. .311 is the largest bullet mine will chamber without neck turning though.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to andiarisaka For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Thanks for the responses. I'm leaning toward buying it, even though it's been Bubbasized. The possible connection to the SAW is interesting. They don't make 'em anymore. It's 117 years old, and I like old stuff. I have a small collection of kerosene lamps, a couple of which were made in the same time period. The Krag
would feel right at home next to a lamp made in 1899. My paternal grandfather was born in 1898. His middle name was Dewey. The story was that he was named after Admiral George Dewey due to Dewey's victory over the Spanish in the Philippines during the SAW. I think Grandpa would like the old Krag.
-
-
Legacy Member
I bought it.
I picked it up today. I don't know enough about Krags to say much about it. I'll let the photos do the talking. Might make a nice light hunting rifle, if it shoots well. The bore doesn't look too bad. Sure wish it didn't have those holes in the receiver, but I'll live with them. I'm hoping I can get that patch out where the butt swivel was and put some sling swivels back on it.
Attachment 43952Attachment 43951Attachment 43950Attachment 43953
Attachment 43944Attachment 43945Attachment 43946Attachment 43947Attachment 43948Attachment 43949
-
-
Legacy Member
Have fun with it! On the bright side, you don't have to worry about destroying any collector value and can do with it as you see fit.
-
Thank You to andiarisaka For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
andiarisaka
Have fun with it! On the bright side, you don't have to worry about destroying any collector value and can do with it as you see fit.
Yes, I see an ACOG on a rail in it's future.
Just kidding. I went to a gun show last weekend, and scored some ammo for it. Also got an 1892 rear sight, and an 03 rear swivel. I think the front sight will be an 03 band type.
Attachment 44154Attachment 44153Attachment 44155
-
-
Legacy Member
LJ, I like it. I can't pass these up if the price is right. Granted they aren't a big "collector" rifle, but I consider myself a collector and have collected several cut down Krag
rifles. I think the 03 front sight is the way to go. Also the 1896 it is a little more rare than an 1898. I have one with the exact same scope mount. An old Weaver or Lyman Alaskan would make the whole package look a little more vintage. Salt Flat
Last edited by Salt Flat; 07-04-2013 at 10:52 PM.
-
Thank You to Salt Flat For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Never heard of "srin ield Armory" before but, they sure do make a nice rifle.!!....
-