+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: ShtLE No1 Mk1* gunmetal buttplate and other details

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    303Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last On
    05-07-2015 @ 03:49 AM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    97
    Real Name
    Peter Otte
    Local Date
    06-23-2024
    Local Time
    12:37 PM
    Oh, I meant to say I think the III on the safety pertains to the safety itself, not the rifle.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Lashenden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last On
    01-19-2024 @ 10:39 AM
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    31
    Local Date
    06-23-2024
    Local Time
    12:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you 303Guy! The gunmetal buttplate is one the changes identified by Ian Skennertonicon in the change from Mk1 to 1*. His list of 1* features is that the design is basically same as a Mk1 except the buttplate changes from steel without trap to gunmetal with trap, rear swivel changes from single screw to inlet two screw, a slightly deeper profile magazine is fitted, stamped '2', the firing pin keeper is redesigned from the earlier knurled button to a screw head with wide slot for use with a coin and fitted slightly more flush with the back face of the cocking piece. That's everything he mentions, but the list may be incomplete.

    As I cautiously suggested in my original post, the Mk1* was approved in late March '06, and was superceded by the MkIII in April '07, so they weren't manufactured for very long - I'm guessing no more than 150,000 were ever made. If most were subsequently upgraded to 1*** and fitted with brass buttplates around 1914, there just can't be many gunmetal buttplates left in existence 100 years later, and presumably gunmetal wasn't such a good idea anyway, or they wouldn't have gone over to brass - too expensive, perhaps, or too prone to damage in service? Anyway, I'm just channelling Skennerton here - I claim no expertise of my own in this matter.

    I think this rifle may well have come from NZicon anyway, as that seems to be the main source of pre-MkIII Enfields these days. I'm guessing only NZ and Austrailian rifles escaped the big conversion to Mk1***? I think you're right, it's just the safety catch itself (and possibly the associated bits and pieces) that's a MkIII part, but I don't know how to spot the correct item - is the profile the same as a III?

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. need help, lost my book. my N0.4 s details?
    By eddystone3006 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-24-2012, 01:32 PM
  2. Some details of an early Inland
    By Garandrew in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-27-2010, 03:54 PM
  3. WIN13 in details
    By Garandrew in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 07:38 AM
  4. Enfield No4 in .410 - any details??
    By Enfield trader in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-22-2009, 07:27 PM
  5. Gorgeous early UEF..details
    By Garandrew in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-12-2009, 09:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts