-
paulpanagi
Guest
1903 smle
I found this most unusual SMLE the other day and I was intrigued because I have never seen this conversion before. It did not come cheap but I had to have it . I already have a 1903 mk1*** in my collection but never have I seen a 1903 mk1 converted to mk111. My first and only thought is that it when through the LOC 13992 (1907) charge loading program.
I have uploaded some photo’s, you will see that on the left hand side are armourser’s date makes 04 05 06b 07 and the last date 09 as you see in the photo. Now that I have paid top dollar for it everyone will now have one.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
08-24-2013 01:41 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
Seems I can't expand the photos...
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Can we have bigger pictures, please?
-
-
paulpanagi
Guest
I have no idea why Milsurps web-program will not expand these photo’s.
-
-
Legacy Member
paulp: When I save those images and try to blow them up there appears to be limited resolution. Did you take them with a camera having image quality set very low? Try a setting that generates an image of around 100- 300kb. Are you using the "manage attachments" button and uploading from your hard-drive?
Ridolpho
Last edited by Ridolpho; 08-24-2013 at 05:45 PM.
-
-
Legacy Member
Try the originals here
Very Rare Early Production 1903 Dated Deactivated Old Spec SMLE - Allied Deactivated Guns - Deactivated Guns
It was discussed on another forum and the only thoughts were that it was one of the surplus bodies used to assemble complete rifles in WW1, just like some of the Long Lee bodies used to assemble Mk3s.
-
Thank You to Brit plumber For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Shame its been deactivated
but still a cool rifle
Dont believe its " one of the surplus bodies used to assemble complete rifles in WW1, just like some of the Long Lee bodies used to assemble Mk3s. " as those tend to be marked (as in my example) with the date of conversion/build ie 1916, the last date on the left '09 is in fact C9 & is an inspectors number & not a date.
Would not say no to it being in my collection.
-