+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Parker Hale bullets

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    musketshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-21-2019 @ 10:51 AM
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    142
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Please let us know who is making swaged musket balls. The Enfield and Parker Hale muskets shoot best with 65 grains of ffg. Under loads will not seat the skirt in the barrel. Those under loads may be all right for 25-50 yards, but a hunting and target shooting load requires 65 gains. As a point of information, original Britishicon bullets had no grease grooves. The bullets were just dipped in bees wax/grease.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by musketshooter View Post
    As a point of information, original Britishicon bullets had no grease grooves. The bullets were just dipped in bees wax/grease.

    British type Minie on the far right.

    And measured about 0.556" IIRC! Have tried some of those with little success so far. Haven't added the wooden base plug/iron cup trick on 'em, yet, though.

    My Circa 1860 Tower short/Sergeant's rifle likes about 45-50 grs. 60grs and over loads just don't shoot well enough with standard Minies to consider for hunting. (Have photos in the camera of said but haven't seen the camera in some time, BTW. Probably in the pine scented hunting clothes box...) Same goes for the US rifled muskets I've shot. The only reproduction rifled musket I've ever tried was hopelessly inaccurate no matter what!
    Last edited by jmoore; 11-22-2013 at 03:06 AM.

  3. Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member gew8805's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    07-19-2022 @ 08:59 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    578
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by musketshooter View Post
    Please let us know who is making swaged musket balls. The Enfield and Parker Hale muskets shoot best with 65 grains of ffg. Under loads will not seat the skirt in the barrel. Those under loads may be all right for 25-50 yards, but a hunting and target shooting load requires 65 gains. As a point of information, original Britishicon bullets had no grease grooves. The bullets were just dipped in bees wax/grease.
    There are more than a majority of experience target shooters and holders of world records that will tell you that you are wrong with that opinion. But, don't take my word for it, check with the N-SSA, the Muzzle Loaders Association of Great Britain as well as the NMLRA to get real information.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    06-04-2020 @ 06:12 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    185
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by gew8805 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by gew8805 View Post
    Please let us know who is making swaged musket balls. The Enfield and Parker Hale muskets shoot best with 65 grains of ffg. Under loads will not seat the skirt in the barrel. Those under loads may be all right for 25-50 yards, but a hunting and target shooting load requires 65 gains. As a point of information, original Britishicon bullets had no grease grooves. The bullets were just dipped in bees wax/grease.
    There are more than a majority of experience target shooters and holders of world records that will tell you that you are wrong with that opinion. But, don't take my word for it, check with the N-SSA, the Muzzle Loaders Association of Great Britainicon as well as the NMLRA to get real information.
    As for the accuracy of his opinion, you might reconsider the all inclusive nature of yours.
    Oh, I agree great accuracy has been obtained by lesser loads and that frequently. But I must say that neither is it correct in all instances. You have to take into consideration the bullet designs, mold manufactures and quality of lead used in making such bullets. I can imagine many cases were skirt expansion could fail to consistently occur with reduced (from originally specified, ie 60-65gr) loads.

  7. #5
    Legacy Member gew8805's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    07-19-2022 @ 08:59 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    578
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim View Post
    As for the accuracy of his opinion, you might reconsider the all inclusive nature of yours.
    Oh, I agree great accuracy has been obtained by lesser loads and that frequently. But I must say that neither is it correct in all instances. You have to take into consideration the bullet designs, mold manufactures and quality of lead used in making such bullets. I can imagine many cases were skirt expansion could fail to consistently occur with reduced (from originally specified, ie 60-65gr) loads.
    Interesting. Do you mean in my statement - which I stand completely behind - or do you mean my use of the quote by musketshooter which is an opinion that I do not necessarily agree with but I simply posted in reference to others who do feel the same. And they are far better, more experienced shots - and hunters - than I.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    06-04-2020 @ 06:12 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    185
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:12 PM
    What I was commenting on was your statement thus; "you are wrong with that opinion."* I actually do agree with you in the main but, your statement is all inclusive- ie, that means you're saying that the Enfield and Parker Hale muskets will never shoot best with 65 grains of ffg., and that light-loads will never fail to properly expand the bullet skirts.

    There are simply too many variables, as I pointed out, for any one opinion to be all or even nearly so, all inclusive. It was that aspect that I disagreed with. Neither am I picking at grammar, Hardly. Mine's lousy enough as it is. My point is that it fails to allow even an instant under which musketshooter's opinion might hold true.

    * This being the opinion, "The Enfield and Parker Hale muskets shoot best with 65 grains of ffg. Under loads will not seat the skirt in the barrel. Those under loads may be all right for 25-50 yards, but a hunting and target shooting load requires 65 gains." originally offered by musketshooter.

    If I gave offense. I am very sorry. I certainly did not mean to do so.
    Jim

  9. #7
    Legacy Member Jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    06-04-2020 @ 06:12 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    185
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by musketshooter View Post
    As a point of information, original Britishicon bullets had no grease grooves. The bullets were just dipped in bees wax/grease.
    That is not strictly accurate. The ends of the paper Cartridges were dipped in the lube blend. The bullets (most commonly the "Pritchett") were swaged to about .564 (That's off the top of my head and may not be exact but close enough to give you the idea.) dia. USAicon paper cartridges were rolled with the bullet nose forward.
    English and most later CSA cartridges were rolled with the bullet nose pointed in. In practice the cartridge tail was bitten off and the powder poured in the barrel, the cartridge was then reversed and the lubed end inserted in the barrel. The remainder of the paper was then discarded. What was happening was they were effectively shooting paper patched bullets. Thus, no need for grease rings.
    In the image, the bottom two are English cartridges (allegedly original) with lubed ends.

    Attachment 47519

  10. Thank You to Jim For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    A. F Medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-10-2019 @ 05:44 PM
    Location
    Erie Pa
    Posts
    1,141
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Thread Starter
    The flyer sent with my bullets lists the maker as Patrick Kaboskey (Google it?) Civil War Era Custom Bullets. He lives in Mukwonago WI. 262-363-4625. Competition Grade Projectiles.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. A.G. and A.J. Parker and Parker Hale site
    By Black Lab in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2011, 08:35 PM
  2. Parker Hale T4
    By Curator in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-28-2010, 05:39 AM
  3. A.G. and A.J. Parker and Parker-Hale Service Rifle Target Sights
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-12-2010, 08:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts