-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
09-29-2013 01:41 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Not sure if this helps but my copy of NSWRA service rifle rules for 1937 does not allow any rifle but the SMLE MK III, MKIII*, MK III heavy barrel or shortened MLE. The allowable modifications are listed and there is no mention of the Ross at all. So the likelihood of these being pre-war range rifles is unlikely.
-
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
martins8589
I have both a Ross MKIII and a P14. The P14 is by way far the kicker. My 13yo shoots the Ross with no recoil problems but avoids tha P14 like the plauge.
That's interesting, but I can't say why that might be!
OP: any update on the 92 year old vet?
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Surpmil
That's interesting, but I can't say why that might be!
OP: any update on the 92 year old vet?
I think it is due to the length of the barrel and stock -weight of the Ross.
Minimal recoil is felt with the M96 Swede rifle over the carbine as well.
-
Legacy Member
Is there any evidence to suggest that Ross sniper rifles were used outside of the training in Canada
during WW2? With the short supply of No.4T's to Canada during the early to mid stages of the war I'm wondering if they pressed the Ross back into operational service especially in places like Italy
?
Thanks,
Paul.
-
-
Advisory Panel
-
-
Legacy Member
As in evidence or them being used outside of Canada
?
Paul.
-
-
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Sniper1944
Is there any evidence to suggest that Ross sniper rifles were used outside of the training in
Canada
during WW2? With the short supply of No.4T's to Canada during the early to mid stages of the war I'm wondering if they pressed the Ross back into operational service especially in places like
Italy
?
Thanks,
Paul.
Telescope equipped Ross rifles were requested by the UK
in 1940 after Dunkirk. Canadian reply was that all were needed for training. At least 80 Warner & Swasey scopes were taken to the UK by the 1st Cdn. Div. in 1940. These were fitted to P14 rifles in the UK by persons unknown. Ross MkIIIs with Warner & Swasey scopes were used for training in Canada until at least 1943, in 1944 it was recommended the scopes be scrapped; it seems most were. This is all from "Without Warning". Pacific Coast Militia Rangers were issued the MkIII in WWII as well as Winchester 94 and M17 rifles. Photos show Rosses being used by Veterans Guard or a few other security details in Canada I believe. I have seen textual references to PoW camp guards using them for example.
Since the P14 was already on issue it wouldn't have made sense to introduce another rifle into overseas service.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Legacy Member
Cheers guys, was just something I was wondering while I was going through "Without Warning" a few weeks ago, since it mentions the rifles stayed in Canada
, but not the full extent of what was done with them before they were officially scrapped.
Paul.
-