Results 1 to 10 of 120

Thread: Viewpoint - British Army Contract for L96A1 Sniper Rifle (by Gil Boyd B.E.M)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:48 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,671
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    03:02 AM
    I was involved three times in the loss of a weapon. First a DP Bren that was in a wet muddy snow filled trench which was filled in - and never found. But even though it was an unfireable DP, heaven and earth was moved to locate it using engineers with mine detectors. Never located and written off as an exercise loss at Warcop in the 60's The Browning MG from the tank and later the loss of PART of an SA80 although not as the loser in this case. And believe me the reperciussions are sooooooooo great and the penalties sooooooooo severe that....... Look, you just don't loose them! And as C-Man says (thread 39) come to that, try losing a pair of Binos or compass or any of the other what we call 'starred' or WOCS/controlled stores stuff.

    And you now know the reason why the L42 was withdrawn. It was at the end of its life and new barrels and new bolts could not cure old worn bodies.

    M85's in Military service. I would/will believe it when I a) see documentary evidence (but I don't think that there will be any) b) see one that is UKicon Military proofed. There definately WAS a delay in the implementation of the L96 following the L42 and the few L96's in service were withdrawn for crack testing/metallurgy injvestigation but as I said, there was a rebuild programme for L42'ds to make sure that the small stocks remaining remained acceptable. Not only were new brackets obtained but a small relaxation was allowed for the fitting of the fore-ends. Won't go into that here but......

    Just as a matter of interest the reason why there is a letter C stamped or engraved after the serial number and a crack test mark on the body is to show that the L96 has been tested and re-proofed following three catastrophic early failures during the trials/proof stage.

    I realise that several forumers take my 'what a load of bollocks......' answers to heart, I only want to say it as it REALLY is, on the shop floor. Re the L1A1's and the matchstick farce/fallacy, maybe someone could resurrect the thread or point it out. I'd like to read it again for a laugh.

    Anyway, it's absolutely pi........ er........ pouring down with more rain here in dull, dark, dismal and overcast Oxfordshire

  2. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Essay on British army new sniper rifle ....
    By Ngib in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 07-20-2011, 06:10 PM
  2. British Army`s New Rifle?
    By Simon P in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-25-2011, 02:32 PM
  3. Enfield No 4 Mark I .303 British caliber rifle. British sniper rifle
    By Oatmeal Savage in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 08:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts