+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: 11/44 ROF(F) No5 MkI with MkII rear sight

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member boltaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    10-02-2023 @ 12:21 PM
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    642
    Local Date
    05-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:15 AM
    I think it's pretty clear the OP took the photo with the rifle cocked because he wanted to show it cocked. He has said that was for the photo only, and that he stores his rifles with the bolts open. Trying to judge someone's safety practices from one static photo is impossible, unless someone posts a photo of a gun being pointed at someone else. As for storage, for Lee-Enfields, bolts open or closed is fine. I don't like leaving Mausers bolt open because then they are cocked and that DOES put some constant strain on the springs.

    I'd like to thank the OP for showing us his rifle--it's a very nice looking wartime Jungle carbine. Hope you come again to the forum.

    Cheers

    Ed
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shmlnaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    08-23-2014 @ 10:56 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    05-12-2025
    Local Time
    08:15 AM
    Thread Starter
    Ha, I'm not taking criticism badly. I know that I use safe gun handling practices, so that's enough for me. It does seem to me like you guys are just getting wound up over nothing though, lol. Pictures that have composed subject as a far cry from how things really are. I don't leave my rifles sitting out loose like that and so close to ammo! (even if that ammo is collectable and display only) I just took the pictures there because it was an easy spot t take them and it was too dark outside. The rifle was cocked because I thought it looked better. As for storage, generally it doesn't matter all that much of the spring is compressed or not. Only movement of the spring wears it out, same reason storing mags loaded is fine to do. So long as they are stored unloaded, away form where ammo is handled, checked and double checked, and periodically inspected for signs of rust they should be fine. Another reason I like to store with bolts open is because it allows for a faster visual inspection of the chamber with no manipulation required of the weapon usually. The obvious exception to the being stored away from ammo rule are guns being stored for fast access as a weapon, which obviously need to be loaded (not sure about the rules in other countries, but the US Supreme court ruled that guns have to be allowed to be stored loaded and ready to be fired in case of self defense). But, you should have more direct control over it than guns squirreled away for general storage. Practicing the three rules is paramount for safety when you do handle the firearms, no matter their storage condition.

    I hope you guy did at least enjoy seeing pictures of my No5. I've wanted a good WW2 example of a No5 for a long time, so I'm excited about it. what I've read about the rear sight is that they were only produced and installed on rifles during WW2. After the war, they were declared obsolete in favor of the MkI milled rear sight, and almost all of the No5's that had the MkII rear sight had them replaced with a MkI.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 08:00 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,036
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:15 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by shmlnaaa View Post
    what I've read about the rear sight is that they were only produced and installed on rifles during WW2. After the war, they were declared obsolete in favor of the MkI milled rear sight, and almost all of the No5's that had the MkII rear sight had them replaced with a MkI.
    Don't know about that for sure. All I know for sure is they are supposed to have a sight graduated to 800 yds...Peter will know for sure, and a couple others...
    Regards, Jim

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Why do the Bren Mk3 and Bren MkII rear sights have the same part number?
    By Lee Enfield in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-26-2012, 03:03 PM
  2. Target front sight for No4 MKII
    By Calfed in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-10-2012, 10:30 AM
  3. M1 garand rear sight WW2 sight
    By nchristian in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 11:19 AM
  4. Rear sight base for Target Sight
    By m1903rifle in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 01:02 PM
  5. Ross MkII sight question
    By rayg in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 05:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts