-
Legacy Member
Lee Enfield No.4 Mk 1 (T)
Hello All, I have been looking at this Savage No. 4 Mk 1 (T) on the Oldguns.net website. I really don't know much about these but am learning. I probably can't buy it right now but thought it would be good to hear what the forum members think about it anyway. It seems like a pretty good deal and a starting point if original. I looked at the sample one in the Knowledge Library
and it seems to match up and is in the correct serial range. Still the expensive part is missing--scope and mount. What do you think?
Collectible Foreign Longarms Catalog (2nd item)
Salt Flat
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
Last edited by Salt Flat; 03-10-2014 at 08:25 PM.
-
-
03-10-2014 08:23 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Looks as honest as the day is long. Too tatty to be a fake! (But deserving of some tender loving care). Still appears to have its original bolt, & also has a readily visible scope number. Many Savage Mk1* (T)'s ended up as 'less telescope' rifles, but not all. A few T's also slipped through with 2 groove barrels on them, so the barrel might not necessarily be a replacement.
ATB.
Last edited by Roger Payne; 03-11-2014 at 06:50 AM.
Reason: typo
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
I've done business with John Spangler the site owner from time to time over the years. Great guy, a real gentleman.
David
-
Thank You to snipershot1944 For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
That's a very good price!
-
Thank You to RobD For This Useful Post:
-
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Badger For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Rifle 14C5906, scope No. on wrist 1431.
Just for posterity.
Mag looks like it's going to fall out. A bit like this one!
Attachment 50949
Scope No.1423 was on a 1941 Maltby I used to own IIRC.
Bit of a tangent I know, but what if anything can we learn from the scope numbers seen on these early non-Trials conversions? Specifically, if we see higher numbers from the same scope maker originally fitted to ex-Trials No4(T)s, do we have evidence that some of these early non-Trials rifles were converted at RSAF(E) in the same 'run' as the ex-Trials rifles?
Last edited by Surpmil; 03-11-2014 at 12:00 PM.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:
-
Good point Rob, though it's complicated by the fact that there were several manufacturers & scope number 3050 (for example) an early HBM Co would probably have been manufactured considerably before scope number 2050 (William Watson), as the serial number ranges were split between contractors from the outset. Having said that, it's still doable with a sound knowledge of scope serials.
Speaking off the top of my head 1431 would be a 1941 Watson?
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
-
Thank You to RobD For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Good point Rob, though it's complicated by the fact that there were several manufacturers & scope number 3050 (for example) an early HBM Co would probably have been manufactured considerably before scope number 2050 (William Watson), as the serial number ranges were split between contractors from the outset. Having said that, it's still doable with a sound knowledge of scope serials.
Speaking off the top of my head 1431 would be a 1941 Watson?
Yes, that would fit with Peter's research IRRC Roger.
Quite agree re number allocations and concurrent production by the different makers using their allocated serial ranges. I suppose we don't know when contracts or deliveries actually began for any of them(?)
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
I have two Savage rifles and both are extremely accurate at any range but get very inspiring past 600 yards. Maybe I should say consistent out there. With out digging them out one is a 12C and the other a 15C both were virtually new with the 12C having alight coat of cosmoline
in and out on every surface while the 15C had been cleaned and fired. I would never be shy about showing up at a vintage match with these rifles. My thanks to Roger Payne
and Pete Bloom for their help in scoping up these rifles.
MJ, don't take this personally, but that's crap.
muffett.2008

-
Thank You to MJ1 For This Useful Post: