-
Legacy Member
Bathurst began component production 24th September 1941, the rifle in question would not have been assembled till 1942 so if the receiver was made in the last few months of 1941 then BA on the charger guide would be correct, i have a BA marked charger guide on one of mine but its a '42 action assembled in 1943 s/n D38xxx.
---------- Post added at 07:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 AM ----------

Originally Posted by
Homer
Your 35/36?
Yep, both the cut-away & the 1935 with a barrel date of 3 '36
-
-
05-28-2014 03:41 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
5thBatt
Bathurst began component production 24th September 1941, the rifle in question would not have been assembled till 1942 so if the receiver was made in the last few months of 1941 then BA on the charger guide would be correct, i have a BA marked charger guide on one of mine but its a '42 action assembled in 1943 s/n D38xxx.
---------- Post added at 07:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 AM ----------
Yep, both the cut-away & the 1935 with a barrel date of 3 '36
Ok that's interesting. I'll have to check mine and make sure I've got my facts right. The best 1935 rifle I had that sticks out in my mind as having a painted barrel is sold but I might be able to follow it up still.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
My 42,43,44,45 and all my Mk6s are stamped with BA on the charger bridge the 53s are not.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bindi2 For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Mk6s.. plural.
-
Contributing Member
My '35 is painted.............green
.......in reality it is blued.
-
-
Legacy Member
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
It's a John Jovino. Just trust me. (No, you'll never find the JJCO NY NY).