1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:42 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,542
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    Ok. All of the individual major parts (rifle, scope, & bracket) are genuine. The rifle looks pretty honest to me. Frankly I wouldn't have given the mis-matched mag a second thought. I'd just fit an un-numbered brand new replacement. As JM pointed out it looks like the bracket is mated to the rifle, suggesting that at some point the original Mk3 scope has gone missing. The 1943 dated Mk1 is clearly a replacement. The damaged grat is not a big issue if you blow in the right ears on this forum.

    The low (two digit) numbers on the cradle caps are perfectly ok. They started numbering them at 1,2 then 2,3 then, 3,4 etc. Consequently three digit numbers are ten times more common that two digit numbers, which in turn are ten times more common than single digit numbers. But they all exist. I used to have a bracket with the cradle caps marked '6' & '7'. Never found a '1' & '2' yet, but I'm still looking!!

    Yes, the serial of the original scope to this rifle is a Mk3, but 1944 rifles are strange beasts in that they can conceivably be found with Mk1, Mk2, Mk2/1, or Mk3 scopes! Most will be found with Mk2, 2/1 or 3's, but William Watson were very late changing over from Mk1 to Mk2 scope production as the factory was bombed, & they were still producing the Mk1 scope into 1944. I've owned three 44 dated Mk1 Watsons over the years, & still have one of them. The few I have seen have all been in the 14,000 serial range.

    Sorry, I'm starting to ramble.........!

    ATB.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 06-11-2014 at 07:39 AM. Reason: typo

  2. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. 1943 BSA No4 MK1 T scope, tin and transit chest, any good ?
    By lugerfan in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-05-2011, 08:10 AM
  2. 1943/1944 Springfield M1 Garand *Service* Grade First Look
    By Amsdorf in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-26-2011, 04:03 PM
  3. No.4 Mk.I(T) mfg.1944 with Scope No.32 Mk.I mfg. 1941/2: An odd pairing!
    By jmoore in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-01-2010, 07:01 PM
  4. Canadian Scope 1943 No. 42 Mk 1 R.E.L. not No. 32 Mk 1
    By paulseamus in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-27-2010, 01:47 PM
  5. 1943 Long Branch Scope Question
    By carney31 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 12:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts