1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 2 of 2
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    04:51 AM
    Hardlickher: Thanks for sharing all that. It does make sense that tightening the grip of the front band so that it holds the upper and lower guards in precisely the same way shot after shot would help accuracy. With the heating effects I'm wondering if one or both of the guards are tight against the front "lug"? that the lower fits into when cold- then barrel expansion with shooting would loosen the guards and change barrel vibes (similar effect with Garands).
    With regard to floating, acc. to the new book by Chumak, the standard was to set them up with up-pressure at forend tip. Free floating is not, apparently, mentioned. However, in an old thread I started I described a test of float vs. up-pressure with the same rifle. Definitely got best results with free floating- honest 2 inch 5 shot groups with iron sights. I have noticed that a number of my refurbs (right out of the crate) were well floated and two probably non-refurbed rifles are very nicely floated so I believe it was utilized at some point by the soviets.

    Ridolpho
    Last edited by Ridolpho; 09-02-2014 at 09:47 PM.

  2. Thank You to Ridolpho For This Useful Post:


  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE

Similar Threads

  1. No.4Mk1(T) and L96 Accuracy International (Guns and Ammo Review)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 01-03-2012, 04:43 AM
  2. Follow up to the RR NIB thread...
    By John Holbrook in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-04-2009, 03:25 PM
  3. A Follow-Up to M1 Accuracy "debate" and M80 discussion below
    By AKA Hugh Uno in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 03:34 PM
  4. Follow up on the 1903A4 I bought
    By RBruce in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-14-2009, 04:47 PM
  5. follow this link
    By bearhunter in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2006, 01:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts