1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 136
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 11:18 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,645
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:00 PM
    REL were the first to fit 1moa index plates (RH, thread 105)! Where on earth did you get that from Surpmil? These were being discussed when the first ex-Bren Mk1 telescope was put onto the first rifles! While Canadaicon chose to retro fit the 1moa clicker plates to Mk1's and call them Mk1A's, we simply used up existing stocks of Mk1's and continued into Mk2 production with the 1moa clicker plates and modified drums at the same time. Think of the logistics of retro modifying all (?) of the Mk1's already out there...... Nope, start anew I say!

    Because we modified the clicker plates as well as the range and deflection turret part at the same time (to make the new Mk2 telescope) in order to prevent Mk1 and 2 interchangeability and maintain standardisation we also allowed manufacturrers other relaxations in standards too, it made the Mk2 a different scope - albeit only slightly

    I'm not tooooo sure that I would agree about the other products either. Although regardless of that, REL telescope output was always short of requirements, hence the use of the absolutely dire Lyman (I say dire in UKicon Military trials terms only and not in general laymans use terms of course) and the No67/Mk4 was developed in order to use other lenses currently in greater production. It did say binocular lenses in the papers somewhere but I don't believe this due to the prismatic nature/system of bino optical systems - but I suppose it could be interpreted as 'similar to current' binocular lenses
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 71L block Long Branch sniper question
    By Lee Enfield in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-28-2012, 06:56 PM
  2. Question about Long Branch sniper rifles
    By boltaction in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-06-2012, 11:34 AM
  3. Long Branch alaskan sniper real/fake??
    By superbee in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-05-2010, 05:12 AM
  4. Long Branch sniper auction results
    By husk in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-10-2009, 09:36 PM
  5. Long Branch #4 Mk I T SNIPER !
    By Badger in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 09:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts