1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 14
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,055
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:05 PM
    Attachment 56121Attachment 56119Attachment 56120

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    True Warren, again. But even the workmanship doesn't look particularly impressive. Only my take on things of course. Compare that with one of the BSA-Ainley rifles. Quite useless (?) but the workmanship is to Rolls Royce quality
    Speaking of the Ainley rifles, where is the one with the Patt. 18 scope and mount these days?

    The Small Arms Committee turned up their noses at Col. Acland's rifle and offer, but from what I read in Skennertonicon, that may just be what they told the Colonel. In late 1937 Acland contacts the War Office. In January 1938 Capt. Barlow goes to see Acland and his rifle and not long after...

    In 1938, a special new sniper rifle was suggested built on the No.3 [Rifle]. This was to have a special high velocity cartridge and to be fitted with a Germanicon telescope [sight]....The special sniper rifle referred to above was the .276" experiment "Ainley Rifle"....Six of these were fabricated in the late 1930s by a design team headed by Capt. J. Ainley, at Enfield....The original specifications required a muzzle velocity of 3,700 ft/sec...problems were encountered with the cartridge development and the project was abandoned by 1940.
    Not very cricket to give the Col. no credit, or was it just a coincidence that Col. Acland came calling with his rifle less than a year before the Ainley rifle appeared?

    Why they wanted 3,700 ft. per second is anyone's guess - avenge the failure of the Patt.13?? It would have been such a flash and bang whoever used it in combat would only do so a few times.

    What do the S.A.C. Minutes for later in 1938 say about the Ainley Rifle, anyone got copies?
    Last edited by Surpmil; 09-13-2014 at 07:02 PM. Reason: Clarification
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

Similar Threads

  1. Bought a complete National Match set up "Everything" Rare
    By Rick B in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 05-18-2014, 08:05 PM
  2. Rare or "one-of" Long Branch Target sight for No. 4 Lee Enfield
    By lawrence_n in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 12:53 AM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-10-2011, 12:52 AM
  4. Rare WWII semi-auto Type 5 rifle, aka "The Japanese Garand" (Video)
    By Badger in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-28-2011, 04:12 PM
  5. M1 Carbine - National Postal Meter - Rare "U" code?
    By rokwell in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 10:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts