-
Legacy Member
Interesting Long Branch No.4 MK.1*
-
Thank You to lawrence_n For This Useful Post:
-
09-28-2014 09:00 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
I have never seen that R/REME mark and it isn't mentioned in the usual repair marks info. Mind you, nor are some of the other odds and sods such as 4-TRI BW which was 4 (Tripoli) Sub-Base Workshop which was an off-shoot of the bigger workshops somewhere else! But without doubt the R/REME marks is a repaired mark by a big workshop somewhere.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
lawrence_n
First off, I'm blown away by the depth of knowledge in this forum. The amount of research & information available is nothing short of astounding.
Your opening remark is very kind. That's why I came here too. Seems not all share that opinion though...but glad you like it here.
-
-
The "Star N" mark on your barrel looks pretty similar to the one on the receiver reinforce ring shown by flying pig in his recent thread.:
1942 Long Branch No4 MkI*
-
-
Legacy Member
OK, you folks who have contributed and/or read this thread, I think I have it figured out. The barrel mark is indeed the Weedon Depot mark. As I clean off more crud, the mark came clearer and the missing leg on the "W" showed up a little more. That's one mystery solved. The muzzle has the BNP stamp and the usual .303 proof marks so along with that and the "England
" stamped on the receiver, I'm pretty sure it's a stamp denoting a foreign made arm taken into English military service, not a US import mark at all.
I must share something about this rifle with you gentlemen. I've owned, shot, and had my hands on many Lee Enfields over the past 40 years of shooting. Since I don't live too far from Long Branch and being a staunch canuck and ex-serviceman, I have a particular fondness for Long Branch No.4's. One of my pride and joys is my 1950 Long Branch which I picked up when they hit the market all those years ago. One, because it's Long Branch, and two, because it's the year I was born. Normally, a lot of the purported Long Branch rifles I've seen lately either have a mix of parts on them, or are clearly restored jobs. No matter how beautifully done and with what care (and I've restored a few sporters myself), at the end of the day it's not a factory or service original. This one is! Other than the brass butt plate and the rear sight, it's never been molested and parts haven't been exchanged. All the wood and metal fittings are properly marked and correct to the factory and year. The most pleasant surprise was the condition of the metal work. I'd conservatively rate the bore at 9.5/10. The bolt face, firing pin, and feed ramp all show very little sign of usage so this rifle has seen very, very few rounds down the pipe over it's lifetime. After I've cleaned the wood and taken out a few of the worst dents, I'll post a few pics.
-
Thank You to lawrence_n For This Useful Post:
-
The ENGLAND is not a mark denoting a foreign rifle taken into UK
service. It is something to indicate an IMPORT into the US
The W at the front of the nocks form indicates the presence of cuts or pitting in the bore BUT that the rifle has passed the accuracy test and accepted the running .301" gauge
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
The ENGLAND is not a mark denoting a foreign rifle taken into UK service. It is something to indicate an IMPORT into the US
The W at the front of the nocks form indicates the presence of cuts or pitting in the bore BUT that the rifle has passed the accuracy test and accepted the running .301" gauge
OK. we have some difference of opinions. If you're talking about the "W" inside the star ahead of the knoxform (not nocks form), it's pretty much established that it's the mark for the Weedon Repair Depot. That would tie in with the "REME" stamp on the butt as well as the English parts on the rifle. The bore is only a hair down from pristine condition, and it's not a replacement barrel, so I seriously doubt the barrel had any condition issues.
As to the "ENGLAND" stamp, the rifles I've seen that came up from the US had the distributor mark (ie: caliber and company) stamped at the end of the barrel. My 1950 has the Century Arms & .303 cal. stamp at the muzzle end of the barrel, but no "England
" stamp anywhere. Adding up all the clues, I still cling to my belief that this is a Canadian
Rifle that was examined and proofed and then taken into british service.
Short of actually talking to some old brit who actually was in REME or worked at the Weedon Depot, let's just agree to disagree.
-
-
Contributing Member

Originally Posted by
lawrence_n
OK. we have some difference of opinions.
Short of actually talking to some old brit who actually was in REME or worked at the Weedon Depot, let's just agree to disagree.
You are having this disagreement with an old brit who was actually in REME
I'd suggest you don't stir the pot too much.......he bites.(and he's right.)
-
The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:
-
-
-
Mmmmmmmm You ain't going to believe this Lawrence but........... And furthermore I have the Armourers bible here, in front of me and I will say it again. EMER C-504, Technical handbook for field and base repairs, BARREL, Para 2. You can disagree if you want to or you can have it from the horses mouth. It's entirely a matter for you of course...........
Oh yes......... and the same bible says that it's the nocks form
And I bet that the barrel viewer who decreed that your barrel was worthy of that mark had a tad more barrel viewing experience than you. Mind you, I could be wrong
Last edited by Peter Laidler; 10-03-2014 at 03:26 PM.
-
The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post: