Sorry, not so. As Jmoore pointed out, the bolt sleeve appears to be marked with a different number. Since the average soldier would not have a spare sleeve to make a swap (or mistake) when dismantling/reassembling his rifle, the mismatch suggests that at some time the bolt was completely disassembled and reassembled on the same bench as with other rifles or parts thereof. The finish also looks "too good to be true".
Re: "All matching". On an Imperial Gew98 that means (no guarantee of completeness or correctness)
- Full number on barrel, receiver, butt behind the swivel (dropped after 1908), bolt body, barrel channel, trigger guard, floorplate, buttplate ...
- Last two digits on most items large enough to stamp, i.e. cleaning rod, front cap, backsight leaf, slider, trigger arm, bolt, bolt sleeve, bolt nut, safety lever, extractor ...
- Acceptance stamps on pretty well everything - even the wood screws (up to 1905)
... And, of course, the "Lange Vizier", not the later style of backsight.
It looks as if this rifle has had a complete makeover by somebody. Who that was, is now impossible to tell. And as several contributors have pointed out, look at the bore rather than the external finish!Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.