-
Contributing Member
Ross MkIII (bubba'd) ad some spring scenery.
-
The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to flying pig For This Useful Post:
-
04-18-2015 10:32 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
Shot this one last week, and it's scary good. Did a 1.75" 3 shot group at 200m.
Found a nosecap as well now. Sadly the cap needs restoration as well, but any cap is better than no cap.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
FP,
Well, I got out to the range today and shot my MkIII at 100 metres. Five shots into a group of 2.5" wide, by 1" high. I am very happy with that, considering my near 60 year old eyes. Will do a little bit of playing with the load, but will not being running anything near max loads. Perhaps that stock you made me is the reason, eh?
Congratulations on the great shooter you have there, that is impressive, considering there are a lot of shooters who can't do that with a modern scoped rifle!
-
Contributing Member
Thanks a ton Bubba. I think it's mostly the rifle. My friend who shoots very well took it right after and shot just as well and it was his time shooting the platform.
Back from school now, missed the plaque by 1%. 92 shop, 94 theory, 97 provincial exam. Over half way done now!
I'm sizing up 150 pieces of Imperial brass for the Ross right now, cleaning and annealing. Then I'm going to load some of my favourite load up for it, and a few experiments including 308" 165gr Amax boat tails just for kicks and because you never know.
-
-
Advisory Panel
I used .308 FMJ in .303 ammo loaded up for a #4 T many years ago and it shot marvelously...a nice tight barrel will help.
-
-
Contributing Member
Mk III
Nice score, FP. Sounds like one sweet shooter.
-
-
-
The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to flying pig For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
i will probably have my forum membership revoked for saying this
.... but... i loved it with the cut down stock.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
flying pig
It will get a complete rust bluing of all components and everything else that is missing will be replaced. I've waited a few years for the right timing when I've had the money to get a good one and this is it.
I would think long and hard about that. The bluing and finish I see in your photos is exceptionally good for a rifle of that age. Doing anything to that finish would be a big mistake and would dramatically reduce the value, monetary and historical.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Surpmil, problem is that none of the parts added have a good factory finish. This rifle has been modified heavily from its original form. It's a keeper to me as a shooter, not a collectors item. It's collector value was lost long ago. If I'm going to spend big money on a fancy piece of wood it is going to be nicely re finished to look brand new externally as well. The only parts that have good original finish are the barrel and receiver anyway. The mid band is patina bare metal, butt plate is rough, bolt handle is about 50% and nose cap and sight hood are basically bare. My rust blue is actually much darker than the original Ross finish, if I didn't do it all the original finished parts would look out of place. This rifle lost its history long before I came along.
Last edited by flying pig; 07-27-2015 at 01:23 AM.
-