-
Contributing Member
NZ issued No4/No5 info..
Morning all,
Over the last five years or so, a number of ex New Zealand issued firearms have gravitated toward my collection, currently an Enfield 1917 No1mk3* a 1964 Lithgow
L1A1 and a 1959 L2A3 ... enough to make me consider adding the rest to complete the set.
I know I can go back in the other direction and look for NZ marked Sniders, Martini's etc, but I think for now I will concentrate on the Enfields.
So with this in mind, how common are NZ issued No4's today, anyone know how many were supplied .. and did NZ ever issue the No5 in any quantity??
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
10-30-2015 06:57 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
mrclark: Don't forget about MLE's. Canada
sold 15,000 to NZ
in 1913.
Ridolpho
-
-
-
Legacy Member
didn't NZ
also have no2's and/or no8's?
-
-
Contributing Member
I think the NZ
No8's were sold off a few years back, I would love one of those, pure nostalgia, I and many others on here were taught how to shoot with those fine old .22 Enfileds. But have you seen the prices the No8's are fetching these days ... not spending that much on a .22 trainer, no way!
-
-
NZ
certainly had a batch of No5 rifles that were all stored in racks at the big Ordnance Depot at Ngaruawahia as I recall. They weren't on general unit issue but as I recall, had dribbled into NZ from Korea and Malaya over the years - like a load of other kit of the period/era. No4';s and Stens were still issued throughout NZ but large stocks were being disposed of as the L1's were coming on stream. The No5's were being disposed of at the time and as I remember, my boss and Denny Phillips had one each and I got one for the technical collection we had at the big Ordnance Depot workshop we had there. The weapons in the racks were all in good condition unlike the rusted out junk that had been crated since it arrived in the war. Happy days there.......
-
-
Legacy Member
Somebody posted this some years ago.
History of LE No4 with New Zealand Army
In order to understand New Zealand’s procurement of the Lee Enfield No 4 Rifle one must first try to understand the military and financial situation that existed within and between the allied armies at the end of the Second World War.
The New Zealand Army had begun the war using the SMLE No 1 Mk III / III* as the standard service rifle. For training and logistical support reasons it had decided not to convert to the newer LE No 4 during the war (NZ did adopt the No 4 Mk 1(T) sniper rifle in 1942). Although we were fighting in Europe this decision was heavily influenced by the fact that our nearest weapon producing neighbour, Australia
, was producing the SMLE.
When the war ended New Zealand found itself, financially at least, on the good side of the ledger. We had been ‘loaned’ some major items of equipment through the Lend Lease program, such as our Sherman Tanks, but New Zealand had paid for most of our equipment. This had been done either by direct cash sales or by supplying food or products of equivalent value. It was also obvious that our food supplies would be saleable in Europe for some time after the war.
With the end of hostilities a New Zealand Army Ordnance Corps (NZAOC) Vehicle Park and Stores Depot was established at Assisi in Italy
. This unit’s task was to administer the large volumes of stores and equipment being returned from 2 NZ Division units departing for home. Alongside this unit were staff from the New Zealand Government Stores Board who worked in conjunction with the representatives of the British
Ministry of Supply. Their task was to action the NZ Government / Defence Department plan for New Zealand’s post war re-equipment program.
New Zealand was given the option of purchasing equipment that had been on loan to us, and in many cases, such as the Sherman Tanks, we declined. We had already purchased enough Valentine Tanks for our perceived post war needs. It was a similar case with the Thompson sub machine gun. We had purchased quite a number early in the war, but had decided on 9mm as the post war submachine gun calibre. While New Zealand was sorting and returning equipment many other countries were going through the same process, so stockpiles of surpluses were being established around Europe. Much of this equipment was then being offered at bargain basement rates to member nations, especially if they would take the equipment in lieu of cash. This situation enabled New Zealand to update or increase our holdings of much of our military equipment.
Quantities of LE No 4 rifles began to be received at Assisi in late 1945. These were made up of good condition used rifles from various manufactures and of differing marks. Later allocations were made from mostly new rifles of the Canadian
Long Branch Mk 1* ‘wartime standard’. The exact number acquired by New Zealand is unknown but a suggested figure of 50,000 seems likely. The No 4 rifles began to arrive after the preparations for the occupation force in Japan
had begun and so Jay-Force sailed with the venerable SMLE.
It was not until the Malayan ‘emergency’ and the introduction of Compulsory Military Training (CMT) in New Zealand in 1948 that the LE No 4 rifle came into wide spread use. Even then it never completely replaced the SMLE, which remained in service in cadet units and was the standard for ‘Ceremonial’ occasions. The LE No 4 rifle was the service standard by the time Kay Force deployed to the Korean War.
CMT took its toll on the ‘wartime standard’ No 4 Mk 1* rifles and by the early 1950’s parts, especially those used only on wartime production No 4’s became scarce. The recovery of used parts from condemned rifles became the norm.
When the phase in of the 7.62mm Self Loading Rifle L1A1 was announced in 1959 the Chief Armourer was instructed to maintain 36,500 operational No 4 rifles, winding down to 25,000 in 1964. When the final shipment of SLR’s arrived from Australia these 25,000 rifles were placed in war reserve (less the LE No 4 Mk 1 (T) sniper rifles, which remained in service until 1977). In 1970 New Zealand began to receive the M16A1 rifles it had ordered from the USA
at which time the reserve rifles were re-inspected and those gauged not fully serviceable were destroyed. The New Zealand Government then began to distribute the remaining reserve No 4 rifles to Pacific Island nations under its Military Assistance Program (MAP). In the late 1970’s the remaining LE No 4 rifles were declared surplus by the Government Stores Board to be sold off to ‘Ex and Service Members’ for $25.00 each.
In 1988 there were still approximately 80 LE No 4 Mk 1* rifles in store and it was decided to use some of these to arm the ‘enemy’ party for the NZ Defence Force Exercise Golden Fleece. This marked the last use of the LE No 4 rifle by the New Zealand Army and all remaining rifles were issued to the Army Museum, Waiouru, in 1990.
M.S.(Joe) Evans
AC Wpns & Ammo
Army Museum
WAIOURU
-
The Following 10 Members Say Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Many, many thanks for your input all, that certainly answers the question!
Based on that amazingly detailed info I am going to focus on locating an NZ
marked No4. With regard to the No5, I wonder if these rifles were ever marked with the "NZ" and rack number, if they weren't on general issue, must be very rare pieces indeed.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I have seen a No5 with NZ
markings, NZ arms is very much the focus of my collection. The nz marked high point would be my No9 and with the upcoming replacement of the AUG I live in hope that I will be able to replace my civi AUG with a issue one-but I'm probably dreaming
-

Originally Posted by
mrclark303
But have you seen the prices the No8's are fetching these days ... not spending that much on a .22 trainer, no way!
That's my thoughts regarding a straight pull L1A1, but if I ever get the bits to complete the .22 conversion kit then I,d need a L1A1 for it to go in, a vicious circle or catch 22 if there ever was one....... and does it stop there ?
I wouldn't snub the No 8 due to the price (my mistake in the past ) they are an excellent rifle, not only very accurate, collectable, cheap to run and also a good investment. ( a better investment if the statement in the link below is written in stone)
Lee-Enfield Rifle No.8 for the British Forces
-
-
Legacy Member
Dont forget the P14s as well, I have a nice NZ
marked one in my collection
-