-
Contributing Member
M1907 Hooked Quillon - which unit?
I ran into this M1907 hooked quillon bayonet. Can someone let me know which unit it was used with?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
11-22-2015 07:24 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
A SH = Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
another hooked quillon
Maybe 39th Foot Dorsetshire Regiment ?
Opinions would be appreciatedAttachment 67449Attachment 67450Attachment 67451Attachment 67452
-
-

Originally Posted by
Promo
I ran into this M1907 hooked quillon bayonet. Can someone let me know which unit it was used with?
The first one thats been struck out looks like DM?........ The Durham Light Infantry.
---------- Post added at 03:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:19 PM ----------

Originally Posted by
RCS
Either 1st or 2nd battalion, am sure if it was 2nd Battalion it would have a 2 on top ......
-
-
Contributing Member
Yes, first one is a struck out D.M. Below is a A.S.H.
So DM is the Durham Light Infantry (what means the M, if D means Durham?), while ASH means Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders?
-
-
Promo, some of the initials used on markings were a mixed bag, so DM is the first and last of Durham, LI = is the first two of Liverpool (which was the "The Kings" (Liverpool Regiment ), MAN = Manchester regiment
Although the Durham Light Infantry is more commonly known as, The D.L.I, (also pronounced that way)
SX = first and last of the Sussex Regiment
Sometimes but not always the initials with a (dot .) after each one normally indicated the fist letter of the full word, so S.W.B = South Wales Borderers ( more famous when they were the 2nd Warwickshire )
CH = Cheshire Regiment etc
Normally it would have the battalion, Regiment, company and the weapon number, Volunteer battalions were marked differently usually starting with a V, then the company number and regiment then the battalion.....
Last edited by bigduke6; 11-23-2015 at 06:39 AM.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to bigduke6 For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Thanks, that helped! Of course these designations must have been strategy, to irritate the enemy .... 
What is the current value of such a bayonet? I found big variations in terms of value.
-
-

Originally Posted by
Promo
Thanks, that helped! Of course these designations must have been strategy, to irritate the enemy ....
What is the current value of such a bayonet? I found big variations in terms of value.
If it was the same condition of the one RCS has I would say around £600 +, but the condition of the blade lets it down, saying that I,ve seen severe rusted and cleaned up quillion bayonets for over £200 but yours is an example that lies between the two, not perfect but not a rusting relic....... I,d guess around £350+, considerable more with a dated scabbard..... but being unit marked a collector may pay a high premium for it, If it was LI marked I,d be sending a PM.....
Don't take my word for it, Its just based on what I,ve seen etc.
Last edited by bigduke6; 11-23-2015 at 12:26 PM.
-
-
Legacy Member
On the first post, middle picture, it looks like a partial "3" after the letter "M" and this looks like it's been stamped onto the curved edge, perhaps, causing the stamp to slip. Would this be the 3rd Battalion Durham Light Infantry? Didn't most regiments in the British
Army have multiple battalions in WW1?
-
-
Sorry to be a tad contrary but the Equipment regulations from 1900 to 1944, when the practice was officially abandoned, clearly states that the Durham Light Infantry marking for equipment. arms and appurtenances was DLI. However, DM was used to indicate Durham School - which is probably why it remained unmodified for so long!
All of these identifiable markings plus zillions more are all detailed in a little booklet, taken straight from the Equipment Regulations, available from Brian at BDL
Ltd. If it ain't in there, then it ain't from Britain
!
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post: