1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 99
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #31
    Legacy Member TactAdv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last On
    04-14-2025 @ 10:51 AM
    Location
    NE Colorado, USA
    Posts
    238
    Real Name
    Thomas T. Hoel
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    10:27 AM
    Joe, Yes, you are correct in your combinations above.

    The reason for having to match (original Inglis) 8mm barrel + bolt, and L4 barrel + bolt is that those particular bolts are physically dimensioned differently than a std .303 bolt, for just the reason you stated.

    This is the epiphany that the guys at DENEL had.....if you simply made the barrel shank of a new-made .308 barrel LONGER (by the length of the cartridge feed horns on the bolt), you could then keep the std .303 bolt and not have to make new ones specific to the caliber change. Apparently, they regarded the off chance of someone trying to use the wrong ammo a worthwhile gamble in light of NOT having to make another new (and expensive) part at the time (of international embargo). With just the "longer" .308 barrel, they got the functionality desired.

    Yes, you are also correct, original Inglis 8mm bolts were used at first (type proofing), and later new-made "L4" bolts are fully interchangeable to my knowledge. And too, both original Inglis 8mm extractors and all other "7.62mm" extractors, no matter where made, are functionally interchangeable to my knowledge.

    Warren W. may have a salient commentary on the Inglis angle.......and Peter may have to add anything I missed....
    -TomH

  2. Thank You to TactAdv For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. 7.62mm LMG Accessory
    By tankhunter in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-04-2013, 08:08 AM
  2. Ishapore 7.62mm 2A1 CHS
    By Peter Laidler in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-23-2013, 06:54 PM
  3. No.4 in 7.62mm x 51
    By newcastle in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 06:41 AM
  4. 7.62mm No5
    By Simon P in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-12-2011, 04:38 PM
  5. 7.62mm Mauser
    By Calif-Steve in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2010, 10:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts