+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: No 5 Carbine project- Input welcome and appreciated

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member oldfoneguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 10:35 AM
    Location
    long island, ny
    Posts
    702
    Real Name
    Bill
    Local Date
    05-08-2025
    Local Time
    10:37 AM
    Electro penciled or stamped markings generally don't just wear off.
    I've seen markings removed during a refurb but they are generally replaced.
    I do see a broad arrow but no other markings at all, seems strange.
    There should be markings identifying it as being made by Fazakerley or BSA the only makers of No5's.
    Every part of my 1945 Fazakerley has a marking or number or both on it.
    I'm just hoping you didn't end up with one of those Khyber Pass knockoffs that are dangerous to shoot.
    You really need to go over that rifle very very carefully with a magnifying glass to try and find any hidden markings before you put money into it.
    Look for all the genuine No5 traits, fluted chamber, hollowed bolt handle, removed action lug on the right side behind chamber,
    trigger guard figure 8 shaped by the front screw, hollowed out sear ect. None of your pics show any of any of these id factors. - Bill
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Catch22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last On
    09-02-2024 @ 04:35 PM
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    87
    Real Name
    Mike Redshaw
    Local Date
    05-08-2025
    Local Time
    09:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by oldfoneguy View Post
    Electro penciled or stamped markings generally don't just wear off.
    I've seen markings removed during a refurb but they are generally replaced.
    I do see a broad arrow but no other markings at all, seems strange.
    There should be markings identifying it as being made by Fazakerley or BSA the only makers of No5's.
    Every part of my 1945 Fazakerley has a marking or number or both on it.
    I'm just hoping you didn't end up with one of those Khyber Pass knockoffs that are dangerous to shoot.
    You really need to go over that rifle very very carefully with a magnifying glass to try and find any hidden markings before you put money into it.
    Look for all the genuine No5 traits, fluted chamber, hollowed bolt handle, removed action lug on the right side behind chamber,
    trigger guard figure 8 shaped by the front screw, hollowed out sear ect. None of your pics show any of any of these id factors. - Bill








    ---------- Post added at 01:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Seaspriter View Post
    Every Lee Enfield purist will chastise me for what I'm going to say here, but I will say it anyway: Do not use RLO -- it will be gummy, attract dirt, and oxide to a dark chocolate brown over several decades. RLO was used during war because it was plentiful and cheap. BLOicon is better -- it will function better, will dry better, and will take twice as long to turn chocolate brown.

    As a restorer of old boats that have to bake in the hot Florida sun and withstand tropical rain conditions in the summer, I will state unequivocally that if you want the wood on your gun to receive the best treatment, you will not use BLOicon but instead use pure Tung Oil -- it's is a better wood preservative, a better fungicide, doesn't oxidize (thus displaying the grain better) and a more durable, waterproof finish. Tung Oil was used on M1s whenever it was available because it is better, but more expensive. The very best marine varnishes use Tung Oil as their base. The cheap (low quality, poor performing) marine varnishes use Linseed Oil as their base.

    This summer I am going to do an experiment -- put a piece of wood out in the hot sun and tropical rain -- one half covered with BLO and the other half covered with Tung Oil. When the experiment is over, you can see the results for yourself (maybe you'll try it for yourself). Then decide what you want to do with your expensive cherished gun. Just my opinion.


    Brian is the best. If you want to bring your gun back to the highest quality standards, you can't go wrong. He restored my Long Branch sniper -- it is as good as new -- the best Lee Enfield in my collection.
    I actually have some Tung Oil and considered it. Or even putting a few coats on top of the BLO. I've got an old Swissicon 1889 sporter I need to dress up I've considered it using on as a test. I've used the Tung on a couple 22's and it flat made the grain pop.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Spanish Destroyer Carbine Restoration Project
    By mdrim13 in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-01-2017, 08:18 PM
  2. $50 possible 'cuirassier' Mle 1890 Berthier carbine project.
    By Anzac15 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-05-2014, 12:27 PM
  3. 30 carbine DA project
    By hobberdobber in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-05-2014, 10:02 PM
  4. My new Ugly Duckling Project - Inland Carbine
    By GolfBravoUSMC in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-22-2013, 11:13 AM
  5. 03 Bayonet input appreciated
    By RickM in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-02-2009, 12:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts