Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Unusual Defect

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Legacy Member tankhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    06-28-2023 @ 05:15 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,054
    Real Name
    Mike
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    12:00 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Gil Boyd View Post
    Oh well..........me and Peter on our old PARA pay were duped for many years as we thought. Good cause subsidising the REME and AAC so don't feel so bad now
    Hey Gil I an recall a case of a Mess Collegue with 3 Para in B.A.O.R, when I was with them. He had an ND (Negligent Discharge) on the Range. & as per Proceedure dictated. The weapon was cleared & removed from Him. Tagged & Packaged up & came to Me for an Armourers inspection/examination. As he stated the weapon had gone off by itself.

    As He was also a fellow Senior NCO & a very decent Chap. He came to me in a bit of a state, knowing what might happen if the weapon actually were not defective!......

    Well, aid inspection/ examination thoughly carried out by yours truly. & you guessed it, nothing wrong whatsoever with the Rifle (L1A1) So.......What to do I thought?......
    After stripping the trigger meh housing components out. I proceeded to 'Play' with the sear bent on the hammer, & also the engagement bent of the sear. Introducing 'wear' to these parts. So that when you cocked the rifle, SOMETIMES the bearly engaging faces of those areas would allow the hammer to fly forward. Imitating uninitiated firing!........
    I did this so it wouldn't do it every time, but you COULD get it to do this a few times.

    My report stated that with tollerances at the minimum end of the scale on both components. Combined with wear to them also. This would/ had indeed caused the Weapon to Fire 'Inadvertantly'!...................Case dismissed, & aforementioned SNCO was dropped from potential serious consequences to his Career.
    Not a thing I would do normally naturaly. But this chap was a VERY decent Bloke & looked after his Men excellently. He was also under great strain with serious Family difficulties. & we in the Mess felt for Him.

    I warned him that if anything EVER happened like this again (Which I put my hand on my own heart & state, it wouldn't) I would not be able to dig him out again!...

    Result was, I never had to buy a beer in the mess again. & when he was moved into the QMs dept, to the clothing store. I never went short of woollie Pully's Or Para Smocks!
    I had an excellent spare set of issue clothing, that was tailored to perfection also!....

    Not really the thing to do of course. But this case was the exception to the rule. & I never had to resort to anything like that again, Thankfully!

    So Gil, HIS PARA Pay was VERY well received in Beer to THIS R.E.M.E Armourer! LOL

    ---------- Post added at 04:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Brit plumber View Post
    Hey Tankie, I know your out of the mob now but did you see the NEM for the armed forces? The top earners are Army Air Corps pilots and there welcome to it for the job they do. Next up was the RLC Ammo Tec! WTF, an ammo storeman gets paid higher than any other trade in the military!!
    BP, The extra pay for ammo techs is because they are at risk from blowing themselves up all the time. Rendering Inert, all the 105mm Shell cases we are always asking for. To convert into mess Bells with the Punisher motief cut out & filed into the side!....LOL

  2. Thank You to tankhunter For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Receiver defect?
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-18-2015, 07:47 PM
  2. Barrel has had an odd defect?
    By kngsnk in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-22-2011, 05:47 PM
  3. An Unusual L-E
    By Victor Six Bravo in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 05:10 PM
  4. Defect Report/Handle of Oprod
    By clancy in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 12:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts