Ross M1905 target rifle

[browningautorifle]

I find it interesting how they moved the front cap back about 4" on these. I'd think removing it all together would have been easier and still effective.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Lee Enfield]

I find it interesting how they moved the front cap back about 4" on these. I'd think removing it all together would have been easier and still effective.

Actually it's the other way around; on the original MkII** they used a standard stock, and a barrel which was about 2" longer than standard.

To meet the rules it had to take a bayonet, so they are one with a 2" longer hilt.

Then they made a 2" long bar extension for a standard bayonet to lock into.

The 3rd variation used a longer stock so that a standard bayonet could be used and the geometry of the stock was the same as a standard service rifle.

[browningautorifle]

Actually it's the other way around

Well that makes more sense. I didn't know these were specially made that way, always thought they' been altered. Very interesting...we had one as a marksmanship trophy in my Battalion for years and the many times I saw it I thought it had been altered.

[JerryEAL]

Here is a pick of a few of the originals. My Grandfather is the cheery one below the arrow. Zooming in I see what BAR meant about the fore stock. I looked again the hoods are all the same way, My mistake.

[browningautorifle]

Here is a pick of a few of the originals.

I've been to Cornwall, seen the ST&G armories there. Where would those barracks have been, any idea Jerry?

[JerryEAL]

I've been to Cornwall, seen the ST&G armories there. Where would those barracks have been, any idea Jerry?

The picture mentions Cornwall on the bottom. I have no idea. I am the curator of the small family photo collection now, with little to no history on anything. I am glad a few have rifles of interest in them.