1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 17
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Legacy Member cplstevennorton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-05-2025 @ 09:17 AM
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Age
    45
    Posts
    377
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:09 PM
    I'm sort of quoting off the study the Marines did of this in 1938. So honestly my knowledge is mostly only what I'm reading.

    But the Marines report on the Rockwell hardness test states this. That both low and high number receivers were failing the rockwell test. If they were too soft, they were not as much of a risk as if they were too hard. If soft, the receivers could be used, but they would eventually stretch until finally the rifle lost headspace and would be unserviceable. If too hard, they were prone to shattering when you had a rupture. The hard receivers were the ones the Marines were concerned about. And they did have both Low and high number receivers that were too soft or too hard.

    The Marines do state they have the ability to fix too hard receivers in what they called a "Drawback Process." They would heat the receiver to a certain temperature for a specified amount of time, that would draw the metal back the desired amount of points, and then they would let it air cool at room temperature. This brought back elasticity and toughness to the metal.

    The Marines state the safe range for the rockwell hardness test is between 20 and 45 Rockwell "C" Hardness.

    I hopet his helps you some in your search.
    Last edited by cplstevennorton; 02-08-2017 at 01:18 PM.

  2. Thank You to cplstevennorton For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Question on Springfield 1903
    By SUB VET II in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-20-2018, 09:54 PM
  2. 1903 Springfield Question
    By Sipperley in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-05-2013, 10:45 AM
  3. NM 1903 Springfield question
    By Zoggy in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-07-2012, 03:16 PM
  4. 1903 Springfield Question
    By Rick H. in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 10:00 AM
  5. Springfield 1903 safety question
    By BigSky in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-23-2010, 11:51 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts