Ridolpho, Thanks for the comment, I am completely in support of your views. Some are worth leaving 'as is' some are worth restoring, to a certain level.
The rifle this thread started on is a pig, and worthy of being bypassed in its current state by many. However, with some TLC and effort, I see merit in cleaning it up, gaining some experience in several technique refinements and having a better example to sell on to a less fastidious collector, or better - as you rightly point out - a range shooter.
I am buoyed by the comments several have made and the general feeling of concern over the 'fakery' of some restorations. There are several US based companies turning out 'new' rebuilds of old service rifles (I'm thinking K98, M1903A3 in particular.) These rifles may look 'new' and 'flash' but I feel quite cold about them. That others feel similar is a good sign. Authenticity is essential to a collector. Accuracy is essential to a preserver, I feel.
---------- Post added at 08:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:29 AM ----------
Good advice, sir, thank you. I've been reading a few of your articles and am grateful for your generosity to share your knowledge and wit with us. Not sucking up here, just saying 'Thanks, Dig."