+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Canadian Experimental Lightweight No4

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Cantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    05-24-2021 @ 08:44 AM
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    411
    Real Name
    Tom
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    02:17 AM
    Funny you mention that Bruce. I recall seeing a writeup on AIA and they were considering producing a version of the LB Lightweight Rifle. Not sure if it ever went any further or not? At any rate I've never seen one for sale.


    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    There appears to have been several "variants" of the J5550 produced; probably fooling around with bedding, stock strength, etc.

    There also seems to have been some "dispersal" of the surviving examples; there is at least one complete action, (no barrel), and a stock here in Oz. The interesting thing is that the stock, though completely finished, would not correctly accept the action that came with it. Variations on a theme? The trigger-guard attached to this body was steel, unlike the one in the video and the ex-Bob Farris one shown in Skennertonicon's ""Lee Enfield Story". Could these latter two be the same rifle?.

    Part of the problem with the design is that there was not a lot of surface area of recoil-lugs on the body or bearing surfaces on the stock, and as recoil of the body was transferred via a slightly beefed-up "tang" at the rear of the body, there was VERY little wood to absorb and transfer this force without risking splitting the timber. Maybe, if glass-filled nylon had been around.............


    ---------- Post added at 07:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:06 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Warren View Post
    Of the three I have handled one had a severely broken, poorly repaired stock, the other had evidence of crackings at the wrist and the third was missing the butt plate.
    Hmmm...seems they were a bit too "Lightweight"...

    ---------- Post added at 07:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:07 PM ----------

    BTW, for anyone who hasn't seen one...I have the pics someone posted of one of these all apart, showing the recoil lugs, stock inletting etc. Found it quite interesting.

    ---------- Post added at 07:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:09 PM ----------

    Hmmm...seems they were a bit too "Lightweight"...



    BTW, for anyone who hasn't seen one...I have the pics someone posted of one of these all apart, showing the recoil lugs, stock inletting etc. Found it quite interesting.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Cantom; 03-24-2017 at 07:12 PM.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    06-09-2025 @ 12:57 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,287
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    04:17 PM
    Cantom: "I recall seeing a writeup on AIA and they were considering producing a version of the LB Lightweight Rifle".

    I was there.

    That project and several others went away because it was an engineering nightmare, especially if made in 7.62 NATO. MAYBE in 5.56 or 7.62 x 39..........

    Having a rear "leg" like that on the SKS may have transferred recoil a lot better, (and provided somewhere to hang a Mk2-style trigger set-up as well), but that spindly "Mauser-style" stock never looked particularly "soldier-proof".

    Your basic Lee Enfield is a WHOLE lot more robust BECAUSE of the two-piece stock system.

  3. Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No.4 Canadian Lightweight Experimental Rifle - Serial #J5550-12
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-28-2010, 06:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts