-
Legacy Member
SER# LEGIT?
Strikes me as an addon, oppinions.
Attachment 82374
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
03-31-2017 11:58 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
It's looks to have been re-engraved. Many 1943 BSA No.4T rifles had the serial numbers very lightly engraved as original and as soon as they got a post war refinish, the number was easily polished or blasted away and would need be put back on. Most that I've seen were stamped but I guess it would be engraved if the facility had an engraver. What are the serial numbers on the bolt and forend? Do they match? It strikes me as an Indian, (RFI), rework being blued but I can't be sure. British
owned rifles would be phosphate and baked Suncorite paint finish.
---------- Post added at 12:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 PM ----------
I should add phosphate and paint after post war FTR.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
Looks to have been ground, as well.
-
-
It would be nice to see more photo's to assess the fit of the pads & the general look of the receiver as a whole, but even from what we can see I'm pretty sure I'm with Brian. And certainly, an AS prefixed serial number would be perfectly correct for a 1943 BSA rifle. It's likely a genuine but refurbished 4T. As Brian says, it's just unclear who undertook the refurb.
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Yup, looks to have been ground off and engraved after the fact. Could have been a couple different reasons.
-
-
As someone who has over engraved or re-stamped a lost or unclear serial number about a zillion times in the past on a zillion types of kit, ranging from Fazakerley Stens to riflees and bolts and magazines to Kershaw binoculars I'd say that this is what's been done here. If you were at a workshop with an engraving facility handy (called the A&G section) then you'd use it. If you're going to re-engrave, then you should linish clean first
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Standard procedure for the lot of Lee Enfields that came in to the USA
from India about 8 to 10 years ago.
ALL were renumbered that same way.
Both the receiver and bolt handle were so re- numbered.
A larger font that original on both butt socket and bolt handle however you will find the original number on the barrel was not redone.
-
The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Warren For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
If you're going to re-engrave, then you should linish clean first
Is that to leave the visual evidence of the original serial number? Struck but still present?
-
-
Advisory Panel
The irony is that having removed a stamped SN they have replaced with a much shallower, albeit probably somewhere neater, electro-pencilled SN, which will vanish under one or two good sand-blastings. Quite apart from the fact that stamped numbers disrupt the structure of the metal in ways that often allows even ground off numbers to be detected by forensic labs, whereas electro-pencilled numbers do no such thing and are completely gone when erased.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
That is definitely an engraved serial number and you can see the actual depth from the shadow in the figure 4. Not deep but it would survive our bead blasting process. The electric pencil or fuzzy or scratchy pen as we used to call it is a different beast altogether. Even at its highest amp setting it was hardly legible!
Last edited by Peter Laidler; 04-01-2017 at 01:28 PM.
-