Quote Originally Posted by Nick S View Post
What was the basis for taking it? The L98 would never have been a S5 firearm.

Way too long a story to even scratch the surface of, and much of it is sub judice.

---------- Post added at 09:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:02 AM ----------

Quote Originally Posted by desperatedan View Post
I think we should appreciate someone not wanting to go into detail on something such as this and I can imagine it's not a section 1 vs section 5 issue but following the gist of the thread, how an allegedly only military owned firearm made it onto civvie street.

I think the previous posts illustrate how that's perfectly feasible. Makes you wonder how far such illogical thinking could go? Reclaiming L42's?

Hope it all gets sorted for you David.

Kev

There's talk that some of the more 'interesting' L1A1 straight pull conversions have now been investigated.